Demand and growth regimes in finance-dominated capitalism and the role of the macroeconomic policy regime: a post-Keynesian comparative study on France, Germany, Italy and Spain before and after the Great Financial Crisis and the Great Recession

Abstract

We contribute to the recent debates on demand and growth regimes in modern finance-dominated capitalism linking them to the post-Keynesian research on macroeconomic policy regimes. We examine the demand and growth regimes, as well as the macroeconomic policy regimes for the big four Eurozone countries, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, for the periods 2001–2009 and 2010–2019. First, our approach supports the usefulness of the identification of demand and growth regimes according to growth contributions of the main demand components and financial balances of the macroeconomic sectors. This allows for an understanding of the demand sources of growth, or stagnation, if there is a lack of demand, of how these sources are financed and of potential financial instabilities and fragilities. Second, when it comes to the macroeconomic policy drivers of demand and growth regimes, as well as their respective changes, we show that the exclusive focus on fiscal policies, as in the previous literature, is too limited and that it is the macroeconomic policy regime which matters here, i.e. the combination of monetary, fiscal and wage policies, as well as the open economy conditions.

The Sustainable Development of Chinese Technology-Based Small and Medium-sized Enterprises under Government Policies Analysis Based on the PEST Model

“…Foreign scholars linked modern financial capitalism with post-Keynesianism. Taking European countries as an example, they explained that during the period of 2001-2009 and 2010-2019, the monetary policy of the European Central Bank and the policy combination of governments had different effects on enterprises and economic development at different stages [6].…”

The European core–periphery divide: towards a new narrative

“…The potential connection between external debt and the crisis has been recognized (see, for example, Manasse/Roubini 2009), and some scholars have started to seriously consider the potential role of external liabilities in triggering the eurozone crisis (for example, Catão/Milesi-Ferretti 2014). There is an interesting debate especially among post-Keynesians about the connections between current-account imbalances and the debt crisis within different finance-dominated capitalist growth regimes (see Hein/Martschin 2021;Niechoj/van Treeck 2011;Stockhammer et al 2020).…”

Theorizing Varieties of Capitalism: economics and the fallacy that 'there is no alternative (TINA)'

“…In part, spurred by Baccaro and Pontusson's (2016) GM formulation, that empirical work has been elaborated to include additional influences on demand growth via debtled and export-led growth (Hein and Martschin 2021). The former aims to incorporate effects of financialization on growth, while the latter incorporates long-standing Keynesian arguments often associated with development economics.…”