2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-013-0494-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEM Simulation of Direct Shear: 2. Grain Boundary and Mineral Grain Strength Component Influence on Shear Rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mimics the real microstructure of crystalline rocks more closely and allows matching the ratio between unconfined-compressive strength and direct-tension strength more closely, as well [39]. Recently PFC2D GBM studies have been conducted [40][41][42][43], however, while the ratio between direct tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength could be matched by the GBM approach, the Brazilian tensile tests and unconfined compression test results can still not be reproduced with the same model when only one mineral type is considered in the model [43]. Therefore, four different mineral types are explicitly modeled in this study.…”
Section: Pfc2d Grain Based Modeling (Gbm) Of Brittle Failure Of Granitesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This mimics the real microstructure of crystalline rocks more closely and allows matching the ratio between unconfined-compressive strength and direct-tension strength more closely, as well [39]. Recently PFC2D GBM studies have been conducted [40][41][42][43], however, while the ratio between direct tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength could be matched by the GBM approach, the Brazilian tensile tests and unconfined compression test results can still not be reproduced with the same model when only one mineral type is considered in the model [43]. Therefore, four different mineral types are explicitly modeled in this study.…”
Section: Pfc2d Grain Based Modeling (Gbm) Of Brittle Failure Of Granitesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One merit of the PFC2D grain-based model Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 10.1002/2016JB013469 is that the model can not only simulate the microcrack initiation and interaction at the grain boundary but also capture the microcracking behavior inside the grains which is associated with intragranular microcracking. This method has been demonstrated to be capable of simulating the failure behavior and microcracking process of crystalline rocks [Bahrani and Kaiser, 2016;Bahrani et al, 2014;Bewick et al, 2014aBewick et al, , 2014bHofmann et al, 2015aHofmann et al, , 2015b.…”
Section: Grain-based Modeling Approach In Pfc2dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve this issue, Potyondy [34] developed a methodology in PFC2D, where a rock is simulated by deformable and breakable polygonal grains. The results of the calibration of the grain-based model (GBM) to laboratory test results of ÄspÓ§ Diorite, Wombeyan marble, LdB granite, Lodève sandstone have been reported by Potyondy [34], Bahrani et al [35], Bahrani et al [36], and Bewick et al [37,38], respectively. For the GBM with breakable grains, the micro-properties of both grains and grain boundaries must be defined.…”
Section: Calibration Of Pfc Model To Laboratory Properties Of Intact mentioning
confidence: 98%