2016
DOI: 10.1108/ec-06-2014-0140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEM modeling of cantilever retaining excavations: implications for lunar constructions

Abstract: Users who downloaded this article also downloaded: (2016),"Simulation of one dimension shock initiation of condensed explosive by SPH method", Engineering Computations, Vol. 33 Iss 2 pp. 528-542 http://dx. (2016),"Routing algorithm with QoS constraints for real time multicast communications using particle swarm optimization and genetic meta-optimizer", Engineering Computations, Vol. 33 Iss 2 pp. 344-365 http://dx.(2016),"A new strain-based finite element for plane elasticity problems", Engineering Computations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, neither of these methods can obtain accurate data. With the development of the discrete element modeling (DEM for short) simulation method [3], which can reach accuracies similar to those of the results from physical tests [4], DEM has become a powerful supplement to physical experiments. In DEM simulation, it is easy to observe the interaction effect among particles in the sampling process, and hence, it can be used to monitor changes in mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, neither of these methods can obtain accurate data. With the development of the discrete element modeling (DEM for short) simulation method [3], which can reach accuracies similar to those of the results from physical tests [4], DEM has become a powerful supplement to physical experiments. In DEM simulation, it is easy to observe the interaction effect among particles in the sampling process, and hence, it can be used to monitor changes in mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (Kung et al, 2007;Kung et al, 2009;Schädlich and Schweiger, 2012), have innovatively considered the small strain stiffness behavior of soils and obtained accurate predictions. In addition, due to its natural deposition, the soil always exhibits naturally inherent cross-anisotropy of elasticity (Jiang et al, 2016a;Jiang et al, 2017), which has a significant effect on lateral wall deflection and ground movement in an excavation (Jiang et al, 2016b;Teng et al, 2014). Due to the integrity that exists between the soil and the structure in an excavation, associating the structures' parameters (e.g., stiffness of the diagram wall, of supporting structures) with the soil parameters in the optimization could give more accurate predictions of the wall and ground responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is particular interest in the study of the behavior of the lunar regolith at low effective stresses, but such experiments are difficult to be performed in the laboratory due to the effect of terrestrial gravity and the models used should be scaled for Moon's gravitational acceleration (Cafaro et al, 2018;Hasan & Alshibli, 2010;Sture et al, 1998). Hence, cost-effective numerical modeling tools such as the discrete element method (DEM; after Cundall & Strack, 1979) have been implemented for the simulation of the lunar regolith and its interactions with rover vehicles (Knuth et al, 2012;Li et al, 2010;Nakashima et al, 2010Nakashima et al, , 2011Sullivan et al, 2011) and retaining structures (Jiang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%