2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEM modeling and experimental analysis of the static behavior of a dry-joints masonry cross vaults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
32
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, structural resistance of dry-joint masonry buildings with different morphologies present differences under similar earthquake conditions. Several pieces of research have been conducted to examine one or two of the characteristics affecting structural resistance of dry-joint masonry buildings (de Felice, 2011;Foti et al, 2018;Giuffrè, 1996;Jimenez, 2011;Vaculik et al, 2004). The variation in the organisation of blocks is evaluated in the majority of the studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In turn, structural resistance of dry-joint masonry buildings with different morphologies present differences under similar earthquake conditions. Several pieces of research have been conducted to examine one or two of the characteristics affecting structural resistance of dry-joint masonry buildings (de Felice, 2011;Foti et al, 2018;Giuffrè, 1996;Jimenez, 2011;Vaculik et al, 2004). The variation in the organisation of blocks is evaluated in the majority of the studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in the organisation of blocks is evaluated in the majority of the studies. For example, de Felice (2011) studied stone size and number of headers; Foti et al (2018) studied masonry pattern, and Giuffrè (1996) studied the usage of header stones between leaves. The organisation of blocks was also examined in relation to material characteristics (Giuffre et al, 1994;Godio et al, 2018;Vaculik, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, block-based approaches consider the structure as an assembly of separate blocks which can interact through specific laws. This approach represents the most accurate analysis tool [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], even if the description of a historic vault block-by-block is still challenging and computationally demanding. In this framework, software tools based on limit analysis of rigid blocks have been lately developed for the 2D analysis of masonry bridges (LimitState: RING software originally developed in [23]), and for the limit analysis of masonry structures modelled as assemblages of 3D rigid blocks subjected to live loads and settlements (LiABlock_3D [24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few FE softwares were specifically developed for analysing masonry curved structures [11][12][13]. Furthermode, the use of Discrete Element methods is proving its efficacy because of their capacity to model the discrete nature of masonry and the possibility of considering large displacements [14][15][16]. Few researchers analysed the seismic behavior of vaults by simulating seismic actions as differential displacements applied to supports using both numerical [17] and experimental approaches [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%