2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEM–FEA estimation of pores arrangement effect on the compressive Young’s modulus for Mg foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of initial boundary conditions helps to create more realistic sintering models that take the naturally occurring fluctuations within real green bodies into account. The results calculated by the kMC method can be integrated into FEM component‐level sintering models in order to define the average microstructure of the sintering component …”
Section: Conversion Of Highly Filled Papers Into Paper‐derived Sintermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of initial boundary conditions helps to create more realistic sintering models that take the naturally occurring fluctuations within real green bodies into account. The results calculated by the kMC method can be integrated into FEM component‐level sintering models in order to define the average microstructure of the sintering component …”
Section: Conversion Of Highly Filled Papers Into Paper‐derived Sintermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, finite element analysis (FEA) proves to be a powerful tool for calculating the E values. The accuracy of E values' calculation relies on the type of the porosity parameters employed [38]. The complexity increases when dealing with materials that exhibit graded porosity in certain dimensions, such as radial, angular, or height, especially when considering the cylindrical coordinate system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to sample size there can be distinguished three main strategies to represent material microstructure [13] : multi-cell models of finite samples, unit-cell models where a single or limited number of periodic base-cells are modeled, and embedded-cell models as combination of both types. In the case of multi-cell models, a relatively large sample is modeled to minimize size-effects and, as consequence, this can lead to high computational costs [26,37,47,71] . In order to reduce computational effort for low density open-cells foams or lattice-type structures, simplified geometrical models [12] can be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%