2004
DOI: 10.1038/ni1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delta-like 1 is necessary for the generation of marginal zone B cells but not T cells in vivo

Abstract: Notch receptors and their ligands contribute to many developmental systems, but it is not apparent how they function after birth, as their null mutants develop severe defects during embryogenesis. Here we used the Cre-loxP system to delete the Delta-like 1 gene (Dll1) after birth and demonstrated the complete disappearance of splenic marginal zone B cells in Dll1-null mice. In contrast, T cell development was unaffected. These results demonstrated that Dll1 was dispensable as a ligand for Notch1 at the branch … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
317
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
15
317
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, when BM progenitors are co-cultured on stromal cells overexpressing DL1, B cell development is blocked ( 15 ). Surprisingly, in contrast with these promising data obtained in vitro, conditional inactivation of DL1 in thymocytes and/or thymic epithelial cells (TECs) does not inhibit T cell development ( 16 ). This discrepancy may be caused by the in vivo presence of DL4, which shares a high degree of homology mRNA expression of the DL1 -driven lacZ gene is confi ned to blood vessels within the thymus, whereas DL4 drives expression preferentially within the cortical epithelium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Moreover, when BM progenitors are co-cultured on stromal cells overexpressing DL1, B cell development is blocked ( 15 ). Surprisingly, in contrast with these promising data obtained in vitro, conditional inactivation of DL1 in thymocytes and/or thymic epithelial cells (TECs) does not inhibit T cell development ( 16 ). This discrepancy may be caused by the in vivo presence of DL4, which shares a high degree of homology mRNA expression of the DL1 -driven lacZ gene is confi ned to blood vessels within the thymus, whereas DL4 drives expression preferentially within the cortical epithelium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Their genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primer sets listed in Supporting Table S1. At 8 weeks of age, Jagged1 cKO mice and control Mx‐Cre ‐negative Jagged1 lox/lox littermates were given a total of four injections of 250 μg of poly(I):poly(C) (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) every 3 days 16. Approximately 8 weeks after the poly(I):poly(C) injections, the mice started to receive subcutaneous injections of 1 mL/kg body weight of CCl 4 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) mixed in olive oil every 3 days for a total of 28‐30 times 17.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of the Notch1 receptor perturbs T-cell development, yet the B-cell compartment appears unaffected (Radtke et al, 1999). Conversely, the targeted inactivation of the Notch2 receptor or Dll1 ligand results in a loss of marginal zone B cells (MZB cells), but T-cell development appears normal (Saito et al, 2003;Hozumi et al, 2004). Importantly, these effects are consistent with phenotypes caused by the inactivation of canonical Notch signaling in these compartments, because loss of the transcription factor CSL blocks both T-cell development and MZB cell generation Tanigaki et al, 2002).…”
Section: Identification Of Maml Proteins and Investigations Into Theimentioning
confidence: 99%