Abstract:Microscopy image analysis is a major bottleneck in quantification of single-cell microscopy data, typically requiring human oversight and curation, which limit both accuracy and throughput. To address this, we developed a deep learning-based image analysis pipeline that performs segmentation, tracking, and lineage reconstruction. Our analysis focuses on time-lapse movies of Escherichia coli cells trapped in a "mother machine" microfluidic device, a scalable platform for long-term single-cell analysis that is w… Show more
“…A variety of neural net and other architectures have been explored to improve detection and classification accuracy and expand generalizability to new types of images. Several deep learning architectures developed for natural images have been adapted for marker detection in images of cells including Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) (Lux and Matula, 2020), Visual Geometry Group (VGG16) (Wang et al, 2019;Shahzad M et al, 2020), Residual Networks (ResNets) (Lee and Jeong, 2020), UNet (Al-Kofahi et al, 2018;McQuin et al, 2018;Schmidt et al, 2018;Wen et al, 2018;Vu et al, 2019;Horwath et al, 2020;Lugagne, Lin and Dunlop, 2020), and Mask R-CNN (Kromp et al, 2019;Vuola, Akram andKannala, 2019, 2019;Korfhage et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020;Masubuchi et al, 2020). In classical image analysis, advances in methodology commonly involve the development of new algorithms; any changes in parameter settings needed to accommodate new data are regarded as project-specific details.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have also added elastic deformations using B-splines (Ronneberger, Fischer and Brox, 2015;Raza et al, 2019;Torr et al, 2020). These methods are not unique to microscopy images, however, and only a few studies have used augmentation to address variation in the brightness and contrast of otherwise identical images (Lugagne, Lin and Dunlop, 2020) or added synthetically generated camera noise and non-cellular debris to make model training less sensitive to artefacts (Schmidt et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2020). A particularly interesting form of augmentation used by Kromp et al (2019) involved manually separating cells from the background and arranging nuclei in grids with random positions and orientations, effectively generating new training examples.…”
Section: Image Augmentation To Improve Model Trainingmentioning
Newly developed technologies have made it feasible to routinely collect highly multiplexed (20-60 channel) images at subcellular resolution from human tissues for research and diagnostic purposes. Extracting single cell data from such images requires efficient and accurate image segmentation. This starts with identification of nuclei, a challenging problem in tissue imaging that has recently benefited from deep learning. In this paper we demonstrate two generally applicable approaches to improving segmentation accuracy as scored using new human-labelled segmentation masks spanning multiple human tissues. The first approach involves the use of real augmentations during training. These comprise defocused and saturated image data and improve model accuracy when computational augmentation (Gaussian blurring) does not. The second involves collection of nuclear envelope data. The two approaches cumulatively and substantially improve segmentation with three different deep learning frameworks, yielding a set of high accuracy segmentation models. Moreover, the use of real augmentation may have applications outside of microscopy.
“…A variety of neural net and other architectures have been explored to improve detection and classification accuracy and expand generalizability to new types of images. Several deep learning architectures developed for natural images have been adapted for marker detection in images of cells including Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) (Lux and Matula, 2020), Visual Geometry Group (VGG16) (Wang et al, 2019;Shahzad M et al, 2020), Residual Networks (ResNets) (Lee and Jeong, 2020), UNet (Al-Kofahi et al, 2018;McQuin et al, 2018;Schmidt et al, 2018;Wen et al, 2018;Vu et al, 2019;Horwath et al, 2020;Lugagne, Lin and Dunlop, 2020), and Mask R-CNN (Kromp et al, 2019;Vuola, Akram andKannala, 2019, 2019;Korfhage et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020;Masubuchi et al, 2020). In classical image analysis, advances in methodology commonly involve the development of new algorithms; any changes in parameter settings needed to accommodate new data are regarded as project-specific details.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have also added elastic deformations using B-splines (Ronneberger, Fischer and Brox, 2015;Raza et al, 2019;Torr et al, 2020). These methods are not unique to microscopy images, however, and only a few studies have used augmentation to address variation in the brightness and contrast of otherwise identical images (Lugagne, Lin and Dunlop, 2020) or added synthetically generated camera noise and non-cellular debris to make model training less sensitive to artefacts (Schmidt et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2020). A particularly interesting form of augmentation used by Kromp et al (2019) involved manually separating cells from the background and arranging nuclei in grids with random positions and orientations, effectively generating new training examples.…”
Section: Image Augmentation To Improve Model Trainingmentioning
Newly developed technologies have made it feasible to routinely collect highly multiplexed (20-60 channel) images at subcellular resolution from human tissues for research and diagnostic purposes. Extracting single cell data from such images requires efficient and accurate image segmentation. This starts with identification of nuclei, a challenging problem in tissue imaging that has recently benefited from deep learning. In this paper we demonstrate two generally applicable approaches to improving segmentation accuracy as scored using new human-labelled segmentation masks spanning multiple human tissues. The first approach involves the use of real augmentations during training. These comprise defocused and saturated image data and improve model accuracy when computational augmentation (Gaussian blurring) does not. The second involves collection of nuclear envelope data. The two approaches cumulatively and substantially improve segmentation with three different deep learning frameworks, yielding a set of high accuracy segmentation models. Moreover, the use of real augmentation may have applications outside of microscopy.
“…However, automated microscopy experiments can generate immense data sets and can create a burden for image processing. To overcome this bottleneck, deep learning software has been introduced 79 .…”
The bacterial cell wall is made primarily from peptidoglycan, a complex biomolecule which forms a bag-like exoskeleton that envelops the cell. As it is unique to bacteria and typically essential for their growth and survival, it represents one of the most successful targets for antibiotics. Although peptidoglycan has been studied intensively for over 50 years, the past decade has seen major steps in our understanding of this molecule because of the advent of new analytical and imaging methods. Here, we outline the most recent developments in tools that have helped to elucidate peptidoglycan structure and dynamics.
“…Currently, most available cell tracking algorithms are designed for in vitro analysis and are not readily adaptable to in vivo conditions ( van Valen et al, 2016 ; Zhong et al, 2016 ; Nketia et al, 2017 ; Lugagne et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). The few in vivo tracking algorithms that exist are modality specific and cannot be readily adapted to our fluorescent longitudinal datasets ( Acton et al, 2002 ; Nguyen et al, 2011 ; Wang et al, 2015 ).…”
Oligodendrocytes exert a profound influence on neural circuits by accelerating action potential conduction, altering excitability, and providing metabolic support. As oligodendrogenesis continues in the adult brain and is essential for myelin repair, uncovering the factors that control their dynamics is necessary to understand the consequences of adaptive myelination and develop new strategies to enhance remyelination in diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Unfortunately, few methods exist for analysis of oligodendrocyte dynamics, and even fewer are suitable for in vivo investigation. Here, we describe the development of a fully automated cell tracking pipeline using convolutional neural networks (Oligo-Track) that provides rapid volumetric segmentation and tracking of thousands of cells over weeks in vivo. This system reliably replicated human analysis, outperformed traditional analytic approaches, and extracted injury and repair dynamics at multiple cortical depths, establishing that oligodendrogenesis after cuprizone-mediated demyelination is suppressed in deeper cortical layers. Volumetric data provided by this analysis revealed that oligodendrocyte soma size progressively decreases after their generation, and declines further prior to death, providing a means to predict cell age and eventual cell death from individual time points. This new CNN-based analysis pipeline offers a rapid, robust method to quantitatively analyze oligodendrocyte dynamics in vivo, which will aid in understanding how changes in these myelinating cells influence circuit function and recovery from injury and disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsâcitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.