1995
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
409
0
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 700 publications
(471 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
409
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used a hierarchical process described by Dajani et al, 25 that included participant consensus (the percentage of participants agreeing on a particular response), followed by stability of opinion in the absence of consensus (consistency of answers between successive rounds of the questionnaire without achieving the pre-defined criteria for consensus), which is consistent with other Delphi studies. [13][14][15]25,26 The demonstration of convergence, (which is a progressive decrease in range and standard deviation of responses as rounds progressed 27 ), suggested increased panelist agreement, and further supported the study conclusions. The anonymous nature of the process avoided the influence of strong personalities and other group dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study used a hierarchical process described by Dajani et al, 25 that included participant consensus (the percentage of participants agreeing on a particular response), followed by stability of opinion in the absence of consensus (consistency of answers between successive rounds of the questionnaire without achieving the pre-defined criteria for consensus), which is consistent with other Delphi studies. [13][14][15]25,26 The demonstration of convergence, (which is a progressive decrease in range and standard deviation of responses as rounds progressed 27 ), suggested increased panelist agreement, and further supported the study conclusions. The anonymous nature of the process avoided the influence of strong personalities and other group dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…As there is significant disagreement in the literature regarding consensus and stability, these values were determined a priori and based on values used in similar studies. [13][14][15][16] Once an item achieved consensus or stability, it was removed from further rounds of the Delphi process. The process was conducted in a "quasi-anonymous" manner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linguistic variables are then converted into triangular fuzzy numbers as suggested in Tables 1 and 2 According to Cheng and Lin [18], if the distance between the average and the expert's evaluation data is less than the threshold value of 0.2, then all the experts are considered to have achieved a consensus. Furthermore, among the n m× ratings of alternatives and n criteria weights, if the percentage of achieving a consensus is greater than 75% [19,20], then we calculate the fuzzy evaluation of each alternative. Otherwise, a second survey round is required.…”
Section: Fuzzy Delphi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the criterion that is used to evaluate group consensus was based on the condition that the group agreement is greater than 75% [19,20]. In the first round, the average of criteria weight was 75.71%, and the rating average was 61.68%.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Fuel Cell Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi method was applied to define the evaluation criteria and sub-criteria. Murry and Hammons suggested that the Delphi method should summaries expert opinions on a range from 10 to 30 [8]. Therefore, an initial questionnaire was distributed to 11 experts.…”
Section: Establish a Hierarchical Relational Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%