2021
DOI: 10.2196/30280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delivering Mental Health Care Virtually During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Evaluation of Provider Experiences in a Scaled Context

Abstract: Background Virtual care delivery within mental health has increased rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding facilitators and challenges to adoption and perceptions of the quality of virtual care when delivered at scale can inform service planning postpandemic. Objective We sought to understand consistent facilitators and persistent challenges to adoption of virtual care and perceived impact on quality of care in an initial pilot phase prior … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current documents have focused broadly on virtual care, and do not consider the specific nuances that are critical to consider for virtual mental health care (e.g., active suicidal ideation). 79 Moreover, to date, only one study 80 has focused on elucidating some of the system and organizational factors (e.g., workflow, setup support) that are relevant for facilitating and supporting virtual mental health care. With limited data on the organizational and system-level facilitators and barriers to delivering virtual mental health care, particularly to Black, racialized and/or marginalized populations, investing in projects that partner with racialized and underserved populations to examine system delivery of virtual care may be useful to better understand the challenges of accessing virtual mental health care at a population level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current documents have focused broadly on virtual care, and do not consider the specific nuances that are critical to consider for virtual mental health care (e.g., active suicidal ideation). 79 Moreover, to date, only one study 80 has focused on elucidating some of the system and organizational factors (e.g., workflow, setup support) that are relevant for facilitating and supporting virtual mental health care. With limited data on the organizational and system-level facilitators and barriers to delivering virtual mental health care, particularly to Black, racialized and/or marginalized populations, investing in projects that partner with racialized and underserved populations to examine system delivery of virtual care may be useful to better understand the challenges of accessing virtual mental health care at a population level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the apparent mental health detriment spanning 18 months from 2019 to 2020 and 2021, the investment in the promotion of mental health care and the development of virtual educational solutions ( 20 , 21 ), the number of students receiving treatment did not significantly increase after the beginning of the pandemic. The WHO mental health survey estimated that only 23.1% of the students with mental illness received adequate treatment ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the expected consequences of the pandemic and its life-change implications, many countries started to promote the importance of mental health care, and virtual care has become a growing area of investment ( 20 , 21 ). Previous studies on mental health care help-seeking behaviors have established that many university students with mental health problems do not seek help ( 22 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the research point of view, future studies should be focused on assessing the effectiveness of mental health interventions that could be implemented under the special circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., social distancing measures). Exploring suitable intervention options such as remotely-delivered, self-administered, and digital interventions ( Strudwick et al, 2021 ; Gorenko et al, 2021 ; Budhwani et al, 2021 ) that could mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic on teachers’ mental health is recommended as the next step to tackle the problem that our study presented. From the policy-making point of view, the government and education system authorities should join efforts to provide self-care strategies, resources, equipment, and training to reduce the stress that teachers experience due to the challenging shift to distance learning.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%