Abstract:Many Clinical Pastoral Education programs pivoted to remote delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our survey explored educators’ preparedness, self-efficacy, and views regarding remote Clinical Pastoral Education. Few respondents were either very (14.2%) or not at all (16.5%) prepared. Most were confident facilitating remote learning (69.8%–88.5%), believing remote Clinical Pastoral Education can achieve outcomes equivalent to in-person (59.1%). Six qualitative themes emerged: educator development, educator c… Show more
“…Finally, participants reported positive student experiences while acknowledging the challenging aspects of the CPE course structure: balancing the demands of CPE and their work responsibilities, the course's pace, and in-person and online interactions. Parallel to participants' opinions on online and in-person CPE learning, CPE educators and students the USA reported certain benefits of online or hybrid modalities: ensuring access to CPE; not reducing the quality of learning; and being as effective as inperson CPE [42][43][44]. However, they desired more in-person interaction and found online learning not without limitations [42,43].…”
Section: Cpe For Chaplaincy Education In Englandmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Parallel to participants' opinions on online and in-person CPE learning, CPE educators and students the USA reported certain benefits of online or hybrid modalities: ensuring access to CPE; not reducing the quality of learning; and being as effective as inperson CPE [42][43][44]. However, they desired more in-person interaction and found online learning not without limitations [42,43].…”
Section: Cpe For Chaplaincy Education In Englandmentioning
Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) is the predominant specialised training for healthcare chaplains in several national contexts. CPE is spiritual care education that uses experiential and action-reflection learning methods to train diverse participants. However, CPE is not established for chaplaincy training in England. Currently, chaplaincy education in England lacks standardisation, leading to inequalities in entry into the profession and inconsistent training and career pathways. CPE has the potential to address these issues. We examined changes associated with participating in CPE and participants’ perceptions about their learning experience. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of CPE as a viable chaplaincy education model in healthcare settings in England. Convergent mixed methods involved pre-post surveys and focus group sessions to examine the experiences and development of seven chaplains, with diverse experience levels and backgrounds, who participated in the pilot CPE unit in NHS England. We integrated thematic analysis and survey results. We identified four overarching themes: Development pathways, Catalysts for development, Advantages of CPE for chaplaincy education, and Experiences with CPE course structure. Participants developed along various pathways: confidence, reflective practice, emotional intelligence, listening and attending skills, diversity in chaplaincy care, and spiritual assessment. Survey results confirmed several themes, indicating gains in chaplaincy capabilities, emotional intelligence, and counselling self-efficacy. Participants emphasised the advantages and effectiveness of the CPE model. Quantitative and qualitative findings converged to provide rich evidence that CPE generated personal and professional development, improving chaplaincy practice. General learning pathways moved from personal development, through the interpersonal learning context, and translated into chaplain competency. Participants endorsed CPE, as a robust and effective training model for chaplaincy in the English context, for those entering the profession and experienced chaplains alike. We conceptualised preliminary models for chaplain development and learning pathways in CPE that need validation and refinement by future research.
“…Finally, participants reported positive student experiences while acknowledging the challenging aspects of the CPE course structure: balancing the demands of CPE and their work responsibilities, the course's pace, and in-person and online interactions. Parallel to participants' opinions on online and in-person CPE learning, CPE educators and students the USA reported certain benefits of online or hybrid modalities: ensuring access to CPE; not reducing the quality of learning; and being as effective as inperson CPE [42][43][44]. However, they desired more in-person interaction and found online learning not without limitations [42,43].…”
Section: Cpe For Chaplaincy Education In Englandmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Parallel to participants' opinions on online and in-person CPE learning, CPE educators and students the USA reported certain benefits of online or hybrid modalities: ensuring access to CPE; not reducing the quality of learning; and being as effective as inperson CPE [42][43][44]. However, they desired more in-person interaction and found online learning not without limitations [42,43].…”
Section: Cpe For Chaplaincy Education In Englandmentioning
Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) is the predominant specialised training for healthcare chaplains in several national contexts. CPE is spiritual care education that uses experiential and action-reflection learning methods to train diverse participants. However, CPE is not established for chaplaincy training in England. Currently, chaplaincy education in England lacks standardisation, leading to inequalities in entry into the profession and inconsistent training and career pathways. CPE has the potential to address these issues. We examined changes associated with participating in CPE and participants’ perceptions about their learning experience. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of CPE as a viable chaplaincy education model in healthcare settings in England. Convergent mixed methods involved pre-post surveys and focus group sessions to examine the experiences and development of seven chaplains, with diverse experience levels and backgrounds, who participated in the pilot CPE unit in NHS England. We integrated thematic analysis and survey results. We identified four overarching themes: Development pathways, Catalysts for development, Advantages of CPE for chaplaincy education, and Experiences with CPE course structure. Participants developed along various pathways: confidence, reflective practice, emotional intelligence, listening and attending skills, diversity in chaplaincy care, and spiritual assessment. Survey results confirmed several themes, indicating gains in chaplaincy capabilities, emotional intelligence, and counselling self-efficacy. Participants emphasised the advantages and effectiveness of the CPE model. Quantitative and qualitative findings converged to provide rich evidence that CPE generated personal and professional development, improving chaplaincy practice. General learning pathways moved from personal development, through the interpersonal learning context, and translated into chaplain competency. Participants endorsed CPE, as a robust and effective training model for chaplaincy in the English context, for those entering the profession and experienced chaplains alike. We conceptualised preliminary models for chaplain development and learning pathways in CPE that need validation and refinement by future research.
“…Administrative tasks like applying for assessment extensions were expected to be undertaken by AI (Zawacki-Richter et al, 2019). However, learners in online learning still fully expect their teachers to perform pastoral care tasks in the online learning environment (Szilagyi et al, 2022) and still turn to them for such support (Spears & Green, 2022). Although AI has advanced significantly in performing many teaching tasks, pastoral care tasks are still expected to be conducted by human teachers/counselors by students (Im & Ham, 2020).…”
ChatGPT, an Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered chatbot, has caused a stir in the Higher Education landscape, with fears of plagiarism and a disruption of the student-teacher relationship that has formed the bedrock of teaching. ChatGPT-3 and now four have been reported to pass many exams, including medical, law, and engineering. Overwhelming concerns from academics about students using these generative AI tools to work on their assessments is alarming. These AI tools are here to stay. Teachers should not treat AI as ‘the enemy’, and instead find ways to work with it for the betterment of learning outcomes for students. Working with AI can mean transforming teaching and the AIed-teacher relationship, resulting in positive outcomes and learning experiences for teachers and students.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.