Delivering a medical school elective with massive open online course (MOOC) technology

Abstract

Introduction: The educational technology of massive open online courses (MOOCs) has been successfully applied in a wide variety of disciplines and are an intense focus of educational research at this time. Educators are now looking to MOOC technology as a means to improve professional medical education, but very little is known about how medical MOOCs compare with traditional content delivery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the course evaluations for the Medicine as a Business elective by fourth year medical students at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (SIU-SOM) for the 2012-2015 academic years was conducted. This course was delivered by small group discussions for 2012-2014 and delivered via MOOC technology in 2015. Learner ratings were compared between the two course delivery methods using routinely collected course evaluations. Results: Course enrollment has ranged from 6-19 students per year in the 2012-2015 academic years. Student evaluations of the course are favorable in the areas of effective teaching, accurate course objectives, meeting personal learning objectives, recommending the course to other students, and overall when rated on a 5 point Likert scale. Ratings show no statistically significant difference between the small group or MOOC format versions of the course (p = 1.00 for all comparisons). Discussion: Students found this elective to be an effective means of meeting their personal learning objectives when delivered in a small group discussion format or by using MOOC technology. The primary advantage of this new course format is flexibility of time and place for learners, allowing them to complete the course objectives when convenient for them. The course evaluations indicate this is a change that is acceptable to the target audience. Conclusions: This study shows that learner evaluations of a fourth year medical school elective course do not significantly differ when delivered in small group discussions or via MOOC technology. This suggests that MOOCs may be a reasonable format to deliver medical school courses.

Twelve tips for teaching medical students online under COVID-19

“…The ubiquitous availability of video and audio on audio devices has enabled performance feedback and assessment in authentic contexts for clinical and simulated learning environments. Ideally, these assessments should be based on high-quality evidence and theoryinformed assessment and evaluation strategies [32,33]. Data science approaches have played an essential role in the assessments, in which analytics are built to monitor student engagement and progress toward learning goals.…”

Blended learning of radiology improves medical students’ performance, satisfaction, and engagement

“…This educational concept has the advantage of allowing students to engage the information of a discipline, at their own pace [13][14][15]. SPOC delivery platforms allow educators to create and deliver interactive courses in many forms as online resources, quizzes, virtual patients, or video-based lectures (VBL) [16][17][18]. Many undergraduate MSs are auditors who engage primarily with videos while skipping over assessment problems, online discussions, and other interactive course components [19].…”

Self‐regulated learning strategies in world's first MOOC in implant dentistry

“…With regards to health care, although there is at present a growing number of MOOCs, published studies are very few and merely reporting expert opinions or descriptive case studies 18. Although peer‐reviewed publications based on MOOCs in healthcare disciplines are emerging, published studies so far discuss mainly non‐clinical MOOCs in domains such as Pharmacology and Allied Health, Medicine as Business, Dentistry for non‐dentists, while there is still a scarcity on a scientific evaluations for clinical disciplines. It becomes therefore imperative to approach such learning environments in a scientific and systematic manner, in order to determine the potential role of such learning platforms in the teaching framework of clinical disciplines.…”