2002
DOI: 10.15365/joce.0504092013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delinquency and Violence Among Girls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of implications for policy, the findings from the present study suggest that policies promoting or fostering resiliency might be more effective if they were general in nature (vs. gender-specific). In contrast to suggestions that a "one size fits all" approach is ineffective at reducing delinquency (see Frabutt & White, 2002, MacKinnon-Lewis et al, 2002, programs or efforts to instill resiliency among individuals in high-risk environments can target the development and sustainment of certain protective factors regardless of the individual's gender. It would likely follow that these polices or programs would be less complex given that males and females do not significantly differ in the factors they utilize to remain resilient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In terms of implications for policy, the findings from the present study suggest that policies promoting or fostering resiliency might be more effective if they were general in nature (vs. gender-specific). In contrast to suggestions that a "one size fits all" approach is ineffective at reducing delinquency (see Frabutt & White, 2002, MacKinnon-Lewis et al, 2002, programs or efforts to instill resiliency among individuals in high-risk environments can target the development and sustainment of certain protective factors regardless of the individual's gender. It would likely follow that these polices or programs would be less complex given that males and females do not significantly differ in the factors they utilize to remain resilient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%