2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineation of sub-basalt sedimentary basins in hydrocarbon exploration in North Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the target depth is the basement which is approximately undulating 5 km–6 km, the data is upward continued at 12 km to remove the short wavelength anomalies. Jacobsen (1987) demonstrated that if a potential field is upward continued to a certain height , then it is possible to focus on sources situated at a depth greater than (see also Lyngsie et al., 2006 ; Mammo 2010 ).…”
Section: Separation Of Regional and Residual Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the target depth is the basement which is approximately undulating 5 km–6 km, the data is upward continued at 12 km to remove the short wavelength anomalies. Jacobsen (1987) demonstrated that if a potential field is upward continued to a certain height , then it is possible to focus on sources situated at a depth greater than (see also Lyngsie et al., 2006 ; Mammo 2010 ).…”
Section: Separation Of Regional and Residual Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validity of the estimated top of density contrasts ( Table 2 , column 4) could be guaranteed by comparing the gravity source depth results against the geologic stratigraphy ( Table 1 , Figure 6 ) produced based on well-log data ( Cherkose and Mizunaga, 2018 ). This source depth estimation method was used to estimate density horizons in northern part of Ethiopia ( Mammo, 2010 ), which lies close to our study area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Layer Layer Geology Depth to top of the layer (m) Density Susceptibility References (Source for the parameters) 1 Pyroclastic and Lava flows (Silicic products) 0 2.477 0.00113425 Well-log data, Seismic study, Spectral analysis, Werner De-convolution 2 Lacustrine sediments 1000 2.34 0.000505 Well-log data, Seismic study and Blaikie et al. (2014) 3 Bofa Basalt, tuff and breccias 1500 2.81 0.0019558 Well-log data, Seismic study, Spectral analysis, Werner De-convolution ( Alemu, 1992 ) 4 Tertiary Ignimbrite 2500 2.58 0.0001825 Well-log data, Seismic study, Spectral analysis, Werner De-convolution ( Alemu, 1992 ) 5 Mesozoic sediment 2900 2.5 0.016 ( Mammo, 2010 ), Multi-Layer 3D gravity forward modeling 6 Crystalline basement 3000 2.74 0.0033 Gravity analysis result (depth), seismic velocity-density conversion ( Maguire et al., 2006 )
Figure 6 Conceptual model of six geological horizons identified from the well-log data, previous geological and geophysical studies and current geophysical data analysis. The color of layers representing stacked horizons where density contrasts occurs.
…”
Section: Datasets and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This filter allows the magnetic data to be transformed as if it were acquired from a higher survey height. The depth of investigation ()d is related to the upward continuation height ()h by this equation (Mammo, 2010): d=h2. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%