2011
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1339-10.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineating the Neural Signatures of Tracking Spatial Position and Working Memory during Attentive Tracking

Abstract: In the attentive tracking task, observers track multiple objects as they move independently and unpredictably among visually identical distractors. Although a number of models of attentive tracking implicate visual working memory as the mechanism responsible for representing target locations, no study has ever directly compared the neural mechanisms of the two tasks. In the current set of experiments, we used electrophysiological recordings to delineate similarities and differences between the neural processin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
80
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(68 reference statements)
10
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because resetting involves abandoning existing representations and then individuating and encoding new objects, we expected the CDA amplitude in the separating shapes condition to drop sharply after the separation (during resetting) and then to gradually recover until it reflected the new number of items. In contrast, if VWM can simply update after the separation, then we should observe only a gradual change in CDA amplitude until it reflects the new object status, without a drop (Vogel et al, 2005;Drew et al, 2011;Luria and Vogel, 2014;Balaban and Luria, 2016b); more specifically, the amplitude should rise because more items are present after the separation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because resetting involves abandoning existing representations and then individuating and encoding new objects, we expected the CDA amplitude in the separating shapes condition to drop sharply after the separation (during resetting) and then to gradually recover until it reflected the new number of items. In contrast, if VWM can simply update after the separation, then we should observe only a gradual change in CDA amplitude until it reflects the new object status, without a drop (Vogel et al, 2005;Drew et al, 2011;Luria and Vogel, 2014;Balaban and Luria, 2016b); more specifically, the amplitude should rise because more items are present after the separation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previously, several studies focused on the ability of VWM to update its representations in different situations, for example, when moving items change location (Drew and Vogel, 2008;Drew et al, 2011;Drew et al, 2012) or when stationary items Figure 9. A summary of the differences between updating and resetting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data were then low-pass filtered at 50 Hz, using a linear finite impulse response filter. The following left and right hemisphere electrodes were included in these analyses, based on previous sites used for similar analyses of position updating (Drew, Horowitz, Wolfe & Vogel, 2011;Drew, Horowitz & Vogel, 2013;Drew & Vogel, 2008): left A7, A8, A9, A15, A16, A17, D29, D30 and D31, right A28, A29, A30, B4, B5, B6, B7, B11, B12 and B13. These channels of interest were averaged together within each hemisphere.…”
Section: Task-related Electrophysiological Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We averaged across five pairs of occipito-parietal electrodes (selected based on prior work [1,4]) and categorized the two resultant waveforms as contraor ipsilateral with respect to the initial position of the tracked object (see Figure 1b). To simplify analysis, we collapsed across direction of motion and initial position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%