In response to concerns about declining writing instruction in K-12 classrooms, this qualitative interview study draws on research-based theatre to better understand teachers' experiences teaching writing in one Canadian province. Through dramaturgical coding of transcripts, we examine teachers' objectives, conflicts, and tactics in teaching writing, as well as the significant role of educators' subjectivities as writers and writing teachers, the settings in which they work, the people who influence their thinking and practice, and their engagement in reflexive inquiry. Two drama-based vignettes explore these themes. We then discuss implications for creating a province-wide professional learning network in critical writing pedagogies.As literacy researchers and teacher educators with close ties to schools, community, and professional education organizations, we began this study with general impressions about the current landscape of writing education in the province. We had observed that writing workshops once commonplace in the province were now a rarity, and it seemed to us that writing pedagogy had been pushed to the margins of curriculum. Across grade levels, in locations where attention to the teaching of writing had persisted, it appeared to have become increasingly standardized and prescriptive. And consistent with researchers' findings beyond our provincial and national borders, we had noticed and heard from local educators that many students, of all ages, faced a "writing diet that [was] formulaic . . .[did] not connect to their lives, and [did] not provide opportunities to grapple with, and think on paper about, socially significant issues and ideas" (Flint & Laman, 2014, p. 72).As a check on these assumptions, we were fortunate to have professional relationships with practitioners across the province, known to us (and to local practitioners) for their passion for writing, advocacy and alliances with their students, and commitment to create meaningful writing engagements. It was to these practitioners and their "insider perspectives" (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993) that we turned in order to better understand the shifting landscape of writing education. We hoped to gain insights about the kinds of professional learning resources, supports, and networks that would be necessary to revive the rich writing legacy of the province and to set a future course for writing pedagogies that call "critical understandings of language, text, discourse and subjectivity" into classroom practice (Kamler, 2001, p. x).