A Companion to American Fiction 1780–1865
DOI: 10.1002/9780470999219.ch19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delicate Boundaries: Passing and Other“Crossings” in Fictionalized Slave Narratives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He also argues that anti-slavery literature written during the antebellum period is incoherent with scattered accounts of slavery and its conditions in America. Sherrard-Johnson (2004) also seems to propagate a similar kind of criticism, suggesting that anti-slavery narratives are mainly scattered and exaggerated accounts of the slaves in order to develop a specific empathy and sentimentality among the people. They also seem to assert that anti-slavery literature mostly consists of fiction than facts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…He also argues that anti-slavery literature written during the antebellum period is incoherent with scattered accounts of slavery and its conditions in America. Sherrard-Johnson (2004) also seems to propagate a similar kind of criticism, suggesting that anti-slavery narratives are mainly scattered and exaggerated accounts of the slaves in order to develop a specific empathy and sentimentality among the people. They also seem to assert that anti-slavery literature mostly consists of fiction than facts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%