Deliberative democracy and trust in political institutions at the local level: evidence from participatory budgeting experiment in Ukraine

Volodin, Dmytro

doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1544683

Cited by 12 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…While large and culturally heterogeneous, much of the EE/CA region shares a common political legacy which influences the relationship between citizens and the state [ 39 , 42 ]. Most countries in the region are officially considered democracies; however, some are described as “hybrid regimes” [ 56 ] due to the curtailing of certain freedoms usually expected in modern democratic societies [ 39 , 57 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Conversely, participatory mechanisms which included a deliberative element were claimed to lead to “rational and just” decisions, which will “be accepted as politically legitimate” [ 56 , 62 ] by both citizens and policy-makers. Furthermore, where deliberation was included in CE activities, it led to numerous other forms of civic engagement [ 63 ] and was considered key in building trust in the political system and between citizens [ 56 , 60 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Democratic engagement is lower in EE/CA than in western Europe, attributed in the literature to distrust of the political system [ 64 , 65 ]. While historically this was due to citizens being “estranged” from power [ 40 , 56 , 63 ], subversion of democratic mechanisms by political actors continues to damage trust in policy-makers [ 39 , 57 , 59 – 61 ], and subsequently to reduce citizens’ willingness to participate [ 63 , 66 ]. This does not, however, imply an ambivalent citizenry, with examples of informal political actions occurring in the region even prior to democratization [ 40 , 67 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Integrating citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in eastern Europe and central Asia: scoping study and future research priorities

Macaulay

Reinap

Wilson

et al. 2022

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The perspectives of citizens are an important and often overlooked source of evidence for informing health policy. Despite growing encouragement for its adoption, little is known regarding how citizen engagement may be integrated into evidence-informed health policy-making in low- and middle-income counties (LMICs) and newly democratic states (NDSs). We aimed to identify the factors and variables affecting the potential integration of citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in LMICs and NDSs and understand whether its implementation may require a different approach outside of high-income western democracies. Further, we assessed the context-specific considerations for the practical implementation of citizen engagement in one focus region—eastern Europe and central Asia. Methods First, adopting a scoping review methodology, we conducted and updated searches of six electronic databases, as well as a comprehensive grey literature search, on citizen engagement in LMICs and NDSs, published before December 2019. We extracted insights about the approaches to citizen engagement, as well as implementation considerations (facilitators and barriers) and additional political factors, in developing an analysis framework. Second, we undertook exploratory methods to identify relevant literature on the socio-political environment of the focus region, before subjecting these sources to the same analysis framework. Results Our searches identified 479 unique sources, of which 28 were adjudged to be relevant. The effective integration of citizen engagement within policy-making processes in LMICs and NDSs was found to be predominantly dependent upon the willingness and capacity of citizens and policy-makers. In the focus region, the implementation of citizen engagement within evidence-informed health policy-making is constrained by a lack of mutual trust between citizens and policy-makers. This is exacerbated by inadequate incentives and capacity for either side to engage. Conclusions This research found no reason why citizen engagement could not adopt the same form in LMICs and NDSs as it does in high-income western democracies. However, it is recognized that certain political contexts may require additional support in developing and implementing citizen engagement, such as through trialling mechanisms at subnational scales. While specifically outlining the potential for citizen engagement, this study highlights the need for further research on its practical implementation.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrating citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in eastern Europe and central Asia: scoping study and future research priorities

Macaulay

Reinap

Wilson

et al. 2022

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hasil percobaan (Dmytro Volodin, 2018) memberikan bukti untuk mendukung hipotesis yang partisipatif penganggaran, sebagai elemen prosedur demokrasi musyawarah, dapat mengubah tingkat kepercayaan politik. (Volodin, 2019). Proyek penelitian ini telah menunjukkan tantangan memanfaatkan platform media sosial di Internet dalam Proses anggaran partisipatif.…”

Section: Telaah Literatur Dan Pengembangan Hipotesisunclassified

Implementasi Penganggaran Partisipatif Di Indonesia

Rahmawati

Supriatono

2019

jsikap. jurnal. sist. inf. audit. dan perpajak.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penyusunan anggaran partisipatif adalah proses di mana warga negara secara langsung merundingkan dan menegosiasikan distribusi sumber daya publik. Penelitian ini disusun dengan metode library research untuk memperoleh informasi mengenai beberapa hal yaitu jenis-jenis model anggaran partisipatif? Apa saja tantangan penerapan anggaran partisipatif? dan bagaimana peluang untuk meningkatkan Pratik penyusunan anggaran patisipatif?dan Bagaimana penerapan penganggaran partisipatif di Indonesia? elemen-elemen penting dalam penganggaran partisipatif?. Kesimpulan yang dapat diambil dari analisis ini adalah model praktik anggaran partisipatif menjadi salah satu cara untuk mengatasi berbagai masalah dalam sistem perencanaan pembangunan. Model praktik anggaran partisipatif dapat diterapkan dalam pemerintahan sesuai tingkat dan kondisi pemerintahan itu sendiri. Dalam penerapannya ada beberapa tantangan yang akan dihadapi, namun ada peluang yang besar dalam perkembangan praktik anggaran partisipatif sesuai dengan tujuan anggaran partisipatif yaitu transparansi, partisipatif, dan akuntabel.

show abstract

“…Б агато вчених-політологів глибоко занепокоєні з приводу кризи демократії в багатьох країнах Європи та світу. Для ефективності демократії як форми правління необхідно, щоб громадяни довіряли державним інституціям [7]. Незважаючи на те, що віра людей у демократію на дуже високому рівні, значна частина громадян не задоволена тим, як демократія працює на практиці [8].…”

unclassified

The Models of Application of the Participation Budget: the European Experience and Prospects of Application in Ukraine

Dorosh¹

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

2019 ДОРОШ Б. Й. УДК 336.1 JEL: H72 Дорош Б. Й. Моделі застосування бюджету участі: європейський досвід і перспективи застосування в Україні Проаналізовано основні методи застосування бюджету участі в Європі та в Україні. Досліджено застосування п'яти моделей партисипативного бюджетування, які існують у Європі, на прикладі країн, що їх використовують. Зазначено основні критерії застосування тієї чи іншої моделі для кожного конкретного випадку, кожного конкретного міста. Визначено недоліки та потенційні ризики, що виникають у процесі застосування бюджету участі в Україні, а також запропоновано випробувати інші методи бюджету участі для мінімізації ризиків. Ключові слова: криза демократії, модель Порту-Алегрі, партисипативне бюджетування, бюджет участі в Європі та Україні. УДК 336.1 JEL: H72 Дорош Б. И. Модели применения бюджета участия: европейский опыт и перспективы применения в Украине Проанализированы основные методы применения бюджета участия в Европе и в Украине. Исследовано применение пяти моделей партисипативного бюджетирования, которые существуют в Европе, на примере использующих их стран. Указаны основные критерии применения той или иной модели для каждого конкретного случая, каждого конкретного города. Определены недостатки и потенциальные риски, возникающие в процессе применения бюджета участия в Украине, а также предложено испытать другие методы бюджета участия для минимизации рисков. Ключевые слова: кризис демократии, модель Порту-Алегри, партисипативное бюджетирование, бюджет участия в Европе и Украине. UDC 336.1 JEL :H72 Dorosh B. Yo. The Models of Application of the Participation Budget: the European Experience and Prospects of Application in UkraineThe main methods of application of the participation budget in Europe and in Ukraine are analyzed. The application of five models of participatory budgeting, which exist in Europe, is researched on the example of the countries using these models. The basic criteria of application of this or that model for each concrete case and each concrete city are specified. The shortcomings and potential risks arising in the process of applying the participation budget in Ukraine are defined, it is proposed to try other methods of the participation budget to minimize risks.

show abstract

Deliberative democracy and trust in political institutions at the local level: evidence from participatory budgeting experiment in Ukraine

Cited by 12 publications

References 30 publications

Integrating citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in eastern Europe and central Asia: scoping study and future research priorities

Integrating citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in eastern Europe and central Asia: scoping study and future research priorities

Implementasi Penganggaran Partisipatif Di Indonesia

The Models of Application of the Participation Budget: the European Experience and Prospects of Application in Ukraine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About