Deliberative Democracy and Public Dispute Resolution

Susskind, Leonard; Gordon, Jessica; Zaerpoor, Yasmin

doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.17

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Relatedly, the deliberative aspect of political CSR can benefit from the multiparty dispute resolution and negotiation literature (e.g., De Schutter, Mattei, Pol, & Ferrando, 2018; Menkel-Meadow, 2012; Susskind, 2008). This scholarship can address important pragmatic questions about how enforcement or compliance is accomplished and how trust operates in multistakeholder situations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Varieties of Deliberation: Framing Plurality in Political CSR

Dawkins

2021

Bus. Ethics Q.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues that the concept of deliberation is construed too narrowly in political corporate social responsibility (CSR) and that a concept of deliberation for political CSR should err toward useful speech acts rather than reciprocity and charity. It draws from the political philosophy, labor relations, and business ethics literatures to outline a framework for an extended notion of deliberative engagement. The characters of deliberative behavior and deliberative environment are held to generate four modes of engagement: strategic deliberation, unitarist deliberation, pluralist deliberation, and deliberative activism. The article concludes by arguing that political CSR will be better positioned to realize its potential by moving away from primarily consensus-centered objectives to a more responsive range of deliberative goals and practice.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Varieties of Deliberation: Framing Plurality in Political CSR

Dawkins

2021

Bus. Ethics Q.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Stakeholder engagement needs clear objectives, realistic expectations and quality facilitation (Adler and Parker Celico 2003;Wesselink and Paul 2010). Over the last decade, a body of literature has been developed describing best practices for facilitation approaches in order to navigate public disputes and to engage stakeholders effectively (Beierle and Cayford 2002;Susskind and Cruikshank 1987;Susskind et al 2018;Webler et al 2001).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each of the three forms of structure selected has a theoretical foundation. The broad question regarding how facilitator choices may influence outcomes remains a pressing question in the field (Franco and Nielsen 2018;Papamichail et al 2007;Susskind et al 2018;Velez-Castiblanco et al 2018). The chosen facilitation style or approach used in workshops appears to influence meeting results and group outcomes (Papamichail et al 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Structured and Unstructured Facilitation Approaches in Consultation Workshops: A Field Experiment

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Facilitators must make important decisions when preparing for consultation workshops. One critical choice pertains to how much structure should be incorporated in a workshop and imposed on group discussions. Highly structured consultations may ensure efficiency and help produce specific outputs. However, too much structure may limit group discussion, creativity, or be ill received by participants. To examine the impacts of structure in a workshop consultation, we conducted a field experiment that compares structured and unstructured facilitation approaches in a workshop on participatory environmental monitoring. We randomized participants (n = 34) into two parallel sessions where they completed the same tasks of idea generation and prioritization but with contrasting facilitation approaches. We collected pre and post surveys to compare satisfaction between groups across a range of variables. We find that structured facilitation with small group discussions provide a modest yet consistent improvement over the unstructured facilitation approach. We also find that women and men had very different perceptions about the level of women's participation in the session. Experimental research designs are feasible for learning about facilitation methods and testing best practices in public participation and consultations.

show abstract

Where Should We Have the Meeting?

Maasakkers¹,

Oh²

2020

Journal of the American Planning Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cohen, S. (n.d.). Collaborative approaches to environmental decision-making: A state agency's guide to effective dialogue and stakeholder engagement. Retrieved from https://www.cbi.org/report/collaborative-approaches-to-environmental-decision-makingstate-agency-s-guide-to-effective-dialogue-and-stakeholder-engagement CONCUR Inc. (n.d.). California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative. CONCUR Inc. Retrieved from https://www.concurinc.com/project/ca-marine-life-protection-actinitiative CONCUR Inc. (n.d.). Columbia River Gorge. Retrieved from https://www.concurinc.com/project/columbia-river-gorge-national-scenic-area-dialoguefall-2010 CONCUR Inc. (n.d.). CONCUR team. Retrieved from https://www.concurinc.com/ourstaff Consensus Building Institute. (n.d.). Susan Carpenter: Mediator, trainer, and writer in private practice. Retrieved from cbi.org. Cruz, E. (2015, June 19). Crozet continues its visioning for a "funky and friendly" downtown. Charlottesville Tomorrow. Retrieved from https://www.cvilletomorrow.org/articles/crozet-continues-its-visioning-for-funky-friendly Department of Community Development. (n.d.). Crozet master plan 2010-DRAFT. Retrieved from http://cca.avenue.org/dci/#CMP Department of Social Services. (n.d.). Public/private decision making draft consensus building process map. Provided by William Logue. Dialogue + Design Associates. (n.d.). The Clinch River Valley Initiative (CRVI): One pager. Retrieved from https://www.dialogueanddesign.com/projects/collaboration/theclinch-river-valley-initiative Dialogue + Design Associates. (2015, June 29). Downtown Crozet Initiative: A vision for Barnes Lumber final report. Retrieved from http://www.dialogueanddesign.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/10/DCI_BarnesLumber_FinalReport.pdf Enventive Consulting. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://www.enventiveinc.com/about.html Goedkoop, M. (2014, May 19). Emerging international consensus on a truly global network of LCA databases. Retrieved from https://www.pre-sustainability.com/news/ towards-truly-global-lca-databases Gyovai, C. (2013, April 16). Living off the land: A Free Union garden yields produce all year long. Dialogue and Design. Retrieved from https://www.dialogueanddesign.com/2013/04/16/living-off-the-land Kennedy, R. (n.d.). Top tips for community engagement. Retrieved from https://106group.com/minnesota-transportation-conference-takeaways Keystone Policy Center. (n.d.). Colorado water and growth dialogue. Retrieved from https://www.keystone.org/our-work/energy-environment-climate/colorado-water-andgrowth-dialogue Keystone Policy Center. (n.d.). Jonathan Geurts. Retrieved from https://www.keystone.org/about/staff/Jonathan-Geurts. Keystone Policy Center. (2017, July 6). Meeting logistics. Provided by Jonathan Geurts.

show abstract

Deliberative Democracy and Public Dispute Resolution

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

Varieties of Deliberation: Framing Plurality in Political CSR

Varieties of Deliberation: Framing Plurality in Political CSR

Comparing Structured and Unstructured Facilitation Approaches in Consultation Workshops: A Field Experiment

Where Should We Have the Meeting?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About