Deliberation, East meets West: Exploring the cultural dimension of citizen deliberation

Abstract

Recent democratic theories have put a greater emphasis on citizen deliberation and participation in public affairs. Guided by the normative ideals of deliberative democracy, furthermore, empirical research has started blooming and citizen forums and town meetings have become common democratic practices recently.The core idea of any definition of deliberation concerns free, equal, and rational political discussion -involving disagreement and argumentation -in the public sphere. This idea of deliberation is, arguably, rooted in the Enlightenment traditions of rationality, autonomy, and equality. As such, deliberation theory and practice have been developed predominantly in Western cultural and philosophical contexts. This understanding of deliberation in Western Enlightenment traditions raises an interesting question: Can the model of deliberative democracy ingrained in Western philosophy be applied to Far Eastern Confucian societies that have different cultural assumptions? The present study explores the potential of deliberative democracy in non-Western contexts, such as East Asian societies. Herein, several cultural traits relating to deliberation in collectivist East Asian societies are identified: The lower value of public talk; the strong influence of social position in talk; the increased pressure to conform; and the unique traits of their cognitive and moral reasoning processes. These traits of East Asians pertaining to deliberation originate from the region's dominant collectivist cultural iii orientations and from Confucian philosophy. Considering these traits, deliberation in the East Asian context will require special care. For the empirical portion of this study, a series of small group deliberation sessions among Americans -representing a Western, individualist culture -and Koreans -representing an Eastern, collectivist culture -have been conducted. They deliberated the same issues either in the face-to-face setting or over the Internet. Findings suggest that deliberation, overall, was beneficial to all participants. However, it was observed that deliberation among individualist Americans featured more arguments than collectivist Koreans and was perhaps more deliberative. Individualist Americans also felt more freedom to express their views in the public setting and assessed the deliberation experience more positively than their Korean counterparts. Measures to promote deliberation in East Asian societies and in non-Western cultural contexts in general are discussed. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to deliver my deepest appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Gerald Kosicki, for his unwavering support over the past four years. Dr. Kosicki provided consistent guidance and encouragement, and without his assistance, I could not have completed my dissertation. I have been genuinely inspired by his extensive knowledge in the broad social sciences, his respect for cultural diversity, and his technological vision, which have formed the fundamental building blocks upon which this dissertation was built. I wish to thank all...

Responsible Innovation: Moving Towards a Culturally Sensitive Approach

“…Collectivistic societies regard individual contributions as belonging to the organisation or community. They prefer to maintain harmony, can be more easily influenced by social cues and show least freedom to express individual opinions in a deliberation process (Min, 2009), compared with individualistic societies (Herbig and Dunphy, 1998). According to Min (2009), deliberation processes in individualistic cultures are characterised by equal participation, freedom to express opinions and reasoned argument in reaching consensus.…”

“…They prefer to maintain harmony, can be more easily influenced by social cues and show least freedom to express individual opinions in a deliberation process (Min, 2009), compared with individualistic societies (Herbig and Dunphy, 1998). According to Min (2009), deliberation processes in individualistic cultures are characterised by equal participation, freedom to express opinions and reasoned argument in reaching consensus. This provides more opportunity for people to try something new and have more reasons to expect reward and recognition for their ideas (Shane, 1992;Everdingen and Waarts, 2003).…”

“…(e.g. Karwowski 2006;Min 2009) Published Anticipation is likely influenced by the goal-orientation of people when dealing with the present and future challenges -LTO: anticipation is likely encouraged by future-oriented goals, focusing on thrift and perseverance, taking into account long-term pay-offs as the way to deal with present and future challenges. -STO: anticipation is likely encouraged by tradition-oriented goals, the past and present achievement, and the fulfilment of social obligations as the way to deal with present and future challenges.…”

Many Minds, Common Sense and Genetically Modified Food: A Role for Q Methodology

“…Citizen consultation is widely expected in Western-tradition states (Hagendijk and Irwin 2006). Deliberative democratic practices are on the rise in East Asia (Leib and Baogang 2006) with attention to cultural differences (Min 2009). These practices and other engagement processes, influenced by a diverse spectrum of participatory theories, seek a balance among different views at a collective level, so that collectively desired activities can move ahead and risks can be controlled.…”

Deliberative and Participatory Democracy in the UK

“…; Sass and Dryzek ). Indeed, it follows from the fact that deliberation is a social activity that there may well be tremendous variation in ‘national repertoires’ (Tilly ), and several theorists have suggested that deliberative democracy is culturally biased (Young ; Gambetta ; Min ).…”