2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deletions and Node Reconstructions in a Dependency-Based Multilevel Annotation Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then it judges the category of ellipsis and represent it with corresponding label. At last, if there is an antecedent, it will use the coreference link to associate the new node with its antecedent node (Mikulová, 2014;Hajič et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ellipsis Representation In Ptb and Pdtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it judges the category of ellipsis and represent it with corresponding label. At last, if there is an antecedent, it will use the coreference link to associate the new node with its antecedent node (Mikulová, 2014;Hajič et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ellipsis Representation In Ptb and Pdtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Ellipsis in coordination -there are various situations where coordinate constituents allow or require semantic interpretation that involves ellipsis and thus leads to empty nodes (Hajič et al 2015;Droganova and Zeman 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%