DMD gene exons duplications account for up to 5-10 % of Duchenne (DMD) and up to 5-19% of Becker (BMD) muscular dystrophies; as for the more common deletions, the genotype-phenotype correlation and the genetic prognosis are generally based on the "reading frame rule". Nevertheless, the transcriptional profile of duplications, abridging the genomic configuration to the eventual protein effect, has been poorly studied. We describe 26 DMD gene duplications occurring in 33 unrelated patients and detected among a cohort of 194 mutation-positive DMD/BMD patients. We have characterized at the RNA level 16 of them. Four duplications (15%) behave as exception to the reading frame rule. In three BMD cases with out-of-frame mutations, the RNA analysis revealed that exon skipping events occurring in the duplicated region represent the mechanism leading to the frame reestablishment and to the milder phenotype. Differently, in a DMD patient carrying an inframe duplication the RNA behaviour failed to explain the clinical phenotype which is probably related to post-transcriptional-translational mechanisms. We conclude that defining the RNA profile in DMD gene duplications is mandatory both for establishing the genetic prognosis and for approaching therapeutic trials based on hnRNA modulation. reversible, age dependent degeneration (Muntoni et al., 2003).Although dystrophinopathies are inherited as an X-linked condition, about one third of patients have de novo mutations in the DMD gene. The most common pathogenic changes are intragenic deletions, which account for 65% of all mutations, indeed the frequency of duplications may range from 5% to 10% in DMD and from 5 to 19% in BMD patients (Aartsma-Rus et al.,2006;Kesari et al.,2008). The remaining cases (roughly 20%) are thought to be caused by a combination of small mutations (most commonly point mutations resulting in nonsense or frameshift mutations), pure intronic deletions or exonic insertion of repetitive sequences (Muntoni et al, 2003).It has been previously reported that deletions are mostly maternally inherited, whereas duplications preferentially originate in the grandpaternal germline (Hu et al., 1990). This implies that duplications present more frequently as familial cases therefore accounting for a higher risk of recurrence (White et al., 2006).In the past, technical difficulties have hampered the detection of quantitative changes in the huge DMD gene, in particular of duplications, and only in the last years the development of new techniques such as multiplex amplifiable probe hybridization (MAPH) (Armour et al.,2000) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) (Schouten et al., 2002) have greatly simplified it, revealing that duplications underlie the 87% of DMD/BMD cases negative for deletions and point mutations (White et al.,2006).The clinical differences between DMD and BMD patients can be generally explained by the Tony Monaco's hypothesis (Monaco et al.,1988): genomic mutations that disrupt the translational open reading frame lead to a prema...