1990
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90407-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deletion analysis of a bacteriophage P2 late promoter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…64,65 Control of late gene expression P2 late promoters share a conserved DNA sequence that is centered 55 base pairs upstream of the transcription start 66,67 and required for late gene expression. 68,69 These sequences are recognized and bound by the 72 amino acid P2 Ogr protein, a zinc-binding transcription factor 70 which interacts with the C-terminal domain of the a subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase to stimulate late transcription. 71,72 The ogr gene is expressed at middle times after infection from its own promoter and also cotranscribed with the FETUD gene cluster late in infection.…”
Section: The Lysis Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,65 Control of late gene expression P2 late promoters share a conserved DNA sequence that is centered 55 base pairs upstream of the transcription start 66,67 and required for late gene expression. 68,69 These sequences are recognized and bound by the 72 amino acid P2 Ogr protein, a zinc-binding transcription factor 70 which interacts with the C-terminal domain of the a subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase to stimulate late transcription. 71,72 The ogr gene is expressed at middle times after infection from its own promoter and also cotranscribed with the FETUD gene cluster late in infection.…”
Section: The Lysis Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satellite and helper classes of activators also show differences in promoter specificity, as assayed in vivo with reporter plasmids. The helper phage activators are generally less efficient on their own promoters and show better expression from the P4 late promoter P sid (1,14), while the satellite phage activators work more efficiently at the helper phage late promoters (1,10,14). Since NucC activates transcription from chromosomal promoters in S. marcescens, we expected that it would fall into the satellite class of activators.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of the activator was induced by shifting the culture to 42°C. Cells were harvested 30 min after induction, and CAT activity was measured spectrophotometrically as described previously (10).…”
Section: Purification Of Nucc Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Previous deletion analysis of the P2 FETUD operon promoter P F (8) and a more detailed mutational analysis of the P4 P sid promoter (21) implicated this upstream region in promoter function. DNase I protection studies confirmed that this region is bound by P4 Delta, as well as the related activator proteins encoded by phages R73 and PSP3 (9, 10) and a cryptic prophage in Serratia marcescens (17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%