2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deletion analysis defines distinct functional domains for protein-protein and nucleic acid interactions in the ORF1 protein of mouse LINE-1 1 1Edited by J. Karn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of its primary sequence using the program MULTICOIL predicts that residues 63-130 form a coiled-coil with a confidence level that exceeds 50% with a 21-residue prediction window. This is compatible with studies that have shown that this region contains determinants required for oligomerization (26,28,64). At the Nand C-terminal ends of the C-C fragment, 18 and 39 amino acids surround the predicted coiled-coil, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An analysis of its primary sequence using the program MULTICOIL predicts that residues 63-130 form a coiled-coil with a confidence level that exceeds 50% with a 21-residue prediction window. This is compatible with studies that have shown that this region contains determinants required for oligomerization (26,28,64). At the Nand C-terminal ends of the C-C fragment, 18 and 39 amino acids surround the predicted coiled-coil, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Sedimentation and atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies indicate that it is a dumbbell-shaped homotrimer that is presumably held together by a trimeric coiled-coil (26). Residues at the C-terminal end of ORF1p show the greatest degree of sequence conservation and bind and chaperone nucleic acids (27,28). In this report, limited proteolysis has been used to identify three distinct domains: the coiled-coil, middle, and C-terminal domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with such nucleic acid chaperone activity (25,31,43,45), we observe that the monomeric RRM-CTD fragment binds nucleic acids as single strands, but does not prevent them from forming base-paired structures that cannot be bound anymore. On the molecular level this could be achieved by an interaction mainly with the flexible phosphate-ribose backbone of a single-stranded nucleic acid, leaving the bases exposed for interactions.…”
Section: Identification Of Rrm Domains In Nlrs and Their Significancesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…S2). This represents a significantly larger portion of the protein as compared with previous studies with the murine protein (23,24,43). Furthermore, we can show that the predicted RRM-and CTD domains (hL1ORF1p-M and hL1ORF1p-C, respectively) are soluble independently from each other and remain monomeric at concentrations up to 100 M. When mixed at these concentrations, they also do not detectably interact with each other (see Fig.…”
Section: Orf1pmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation