2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10327-005-0208-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deleterious effects of fungi isolated from paddy soils on seminal root of rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results differ from those of Dingkuhn et al (1992), who reported slightly higher yields in row-seeded rice compared to transplanting. However, in another study, higher paddy yield in transplanted rice than row-seeded at lower N rates of application was reported (Furuya et al 2005). Transplanted rice enables the crop to make rapid early growth, especially with adequate supply of N to intercept more solar radiation and thus to produce and fill spikelets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results differ from those of Dingkuhn et al (1992), who reported slightly higher yields in row-seeded rice compared to transplanting. However, in another study, higher paddy yield in transplanted rice than row-seeded at lower N rates of application was reported (Furuya et al 2005). Transplanted rice enables the crop to make rapid early growth, especially with adequate supply of N to intercept more solar radiation and thus to produce and fill spikelets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, many soil fungi, which could be deleterious to rice growth, also infected roots grown in paddy fi elds. Most of these are believed to be either nonparasitic or saprophytic pathogens (Furuya et al 2005). Thus, roots of rice growing in paddy fi elds might harbor a number of deleterious or inhibitive fungi or Pythium spp., even though the infected plants did not have any disease symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each trial, six roots were inoculated. The inhibition was categorized in three ways as described previously (Furuya et al 2005): inhibition of elongation, browning of the root tissue, and inhibition of secondary root development. To detect any elongation inhibition, root growth was measured 72 h after the inoculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, some species of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Acremonium and Humicola could promote plant growth due to their antagonistic activity, the production of IAA or specific substance to activate resistance for control of diseases (Dharni et al 2014;Hassan et al 2015;Khabbaz et al 2015;Wenhsiung 2009;Yang et al 2014). On the other side, some species of these genera showed negative effect on plant growth due to their broadspectrum pathogenic activity (Elbanna et al 2014;Furuya et al 2005;Iakovleva et al 2013;Racedo et al 2013;Zhang et al 2014). Additionally, the report of other plant suggested that the harmful microbes were increased with the decrease of beneficial microbes under monocultivated conditions, and the soil ecological function was affected (Lin et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%