2019
DOI: 10.1002/mus.26720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delays in diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: An evaluation of genotypic and sociodemographic factors

Abstract: Introduction: In this study we investigate associations between genotypic and sociodemographic factors and the age of diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).Methods: Data were collected from the Duchenne Registry from 2007 to 2019, and then used to assess the impact genotype, race/ethnicity, neighborhood poverty levels, and other sociodemographics factors have on the age of diagnosis of DMD patients without a known family history, using univariate and multivariable linear regression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our own survey results testify to the bene ts of such standardized management, with all respondents having visited a specialized neuromuscular center for at least one visit. The mean age at diagnosis in this survey was 4.3 years, which is similar to the mean age at diagnosis of 4.43 years reported by the US-based Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy (5) and much younger than the mean age at diagnosis of 7 years in Thailand (6). The percentage of ≥5-year-old patients using corticosteroids was 71.3%, which exceeds the gure of 46.4% reported for ≥5-year-old patients in the United States (7) and the gure of 49.7% reported in the global TREAT-NMD DMD database (8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our own survey results testify to the bene ts of such standardized management, with all respondents having visited a specialized neuromuscular center for at least one visit. The mean age at diagnosis in this survey was 4.3 years, which is similar to the mean age at diagnosis of 4.43 years reported by the US-based Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy (5) and much younger than the mean age at diagnosis of 7 years in Thailand (6). The percentage of ≥5-year-old patients using corticosteroids was 71.3%, which exceeds the gure of 46.4% reported for ≥5-year-old patients in the United States (7) and the gure of 49.7% reported in the global TREAT-NMD DMD database (8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…DMD is devastating muscle disease with an early onset. However, due to a 1.3-2.5 year delay in clinical diagnosis after the appearance of first symptoms, the mean age at diagnosis of DMD patients is 4.4 years [25][26][27] . Since early treatment is recommended [16][17][18] , reducing the delay before diagnosis might be aided via the inclusion of DMD in newborn screening performed under existing public health screening protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not have sufficient information available to test or make conclusions on the reasons why prevalence declined among Hispanics. We can speculate that possible contributing factors may include changes in demographics among the Hispanic population in the USA and across the MD STAR net participating states [34, 35] or delayed diagnosis among Hispanics [36, 37]. Another possibility is purely random variation; while the trend for decline in prevalence is statistically significant ( p = 0.0056), purely random variation is within the realm of reasonable possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%