2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed tendon healing after injury in tetranectin-deficient mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the level of IL-6 had no significant statistical difference between t-ES of 0.3 mA and 2D ES of 0.175 mA, which means that 2D ES achieved the same effect of t-ES but with a 41.7% lower stimulation current. To gain a comprehensive analysis of inflammation after tendon injury, TNF-α, IL-10 and IL-1β were also tested 45 47 . The result showed that the level of TNF-α was not a good indicator because there is no significant difference between sham and non-ES group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the level of IL-6 had no significant statistical difference between t-ES of 0.3 mA and 2D ES of 0.175 mA, which means that 2D ES achieved the same effect of t-ES but with a 41.7% lower stimulation current. To gain a comprehensive analysis of inflammation after tendon injury, TNF-α, IL-10 and IL-1β were also tested 45 47 . The result showed that the level of TNF-α was not a good indicator because there is no significant difference between sham and non-ES group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%