2017
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-219863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed spinal cord infarction following anterior cervical surgical decompression

Abstract: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cord compression is a safe and effective procedure with good outcomes. However, worsening of myelopathy is the most feared adverse event of the surgery. We report the case of a 36-year-old male patient who presented with an acute non-traumatic C5-6 cervical disc herniation causing incomplete quadriparesis. He underwent an uncomplicated ACDF at C5-6, and after an initial period of improvement, he developed a delayed onset of an anterior cord syndrome on day 3, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the neurological function of one patient was not restored until an additional cervical posterior decompression procedure was performed. The pathogenesis of the patients was identical to that in the case reported by Khan et al ( 11 ), who described a 36-year-old male who had developed a delayed neurological deficit on day 3 post-ACDF for C5-6 cervical disc herniation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…By contrast, the neurological function of one patient was not restored until an additional cervical posterior decompression procedure was performed. The pathogenesis of the patients was identical to that in the case reported by Khan et al ( 11 ), who described a 36-year-old male who had developed a delayed neurological deficit on day 3 post-ACDF for C5-6 cervical disc herniation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…[ 1 - 8 ] In our review of the English literature, and based upon Epstein’s review of postoperative MR studies, RPI/WCS was accurately diagnosed in 7 of 9 cases. [ 3 , 4 , 6 - 8 ] Notably, analysis of 2 cases originally identifed as having RPI/WCS were excluded as they exhibited new/residual postoperative “extrinsic disease” (e.g. stenosis and OPLL respectively) that the authors’ themselves determined warranted (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1973 case, and 2 additional Japanese studies) that met the MR-documented inclusion criteria) [Table1]. [ 1 - 4 , 6 - 8 ] In 2013, Chin et al . noted that;“… paralysis ( with RPI/WCS ) is extraordinarily rare”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations