1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199911)54:3<303::aid-mrd11>3.0.co;2-0
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Delayed sperm incorporation into parthenogenetic mouse eggs: Sperm nucleus transformation and development of resulting embryos
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
19
3
1
0
Citation Types
1
5
0
0
Year Published
2000
2024
Publication Types
Select...
22
1
Relationship
1
22
Authors
Journals
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 29 publications
1
5
0
0
“…In the mouse, spermatozoa penetrating the oocyte 3 h or more after activation form abnormal chromatin and fail to form a normal pronucleus (Maleszewski et al, 1999). Similarly, we observed that much less sperm…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the mouse, spermatozoa penetrating the oocyte 3 h or more after activation form abnormal chromatin and fail to form a normal pronucleus (Maleszewski et al, 1999). Similarly, we observed that much less sperm…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Transformation of both female and male chromatin during this phase may be crucial for proper regulation of parental imprinting. Previous experiments have demonstrated that male chromatin is able to form a functional pronucleus in the second rather than the first cell cycle, however, is unable to support development to term (Plusa et al, 1997;Maleszewski et al, 1999). No study has previously been performed to investigate whether female chromatin in the form of a metaphase plate of the second meiotic division can form a The differences between the groups (anaphase vs. anaphase/ telophase, for full sized and underdeveloped nuclei), as calculated using w 2 test, are statistically significant at P < 0.001 (1 degree of freedom).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, it was also reported that round spermatids injected 1 h after oocyte activation failed to undergo NEBD and their nuclei remained small (10,11). Finally, the increasing time interval between activation and insemination was known to dramatically decrease the ability of oocytes to promote the transformation of sperm nucleus into a fully formed male pronucleus in mouse (24) and pig (25), which may offer an additional explanation for the poor result in the preactivation group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
