2017
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed severe bleeding complications after treatment of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
21
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 75% (3/4) bleeding cases in LAMS of our study was observed at about 1 week after procedure, indicating that early bleeding might be more frequent than expected. To confirm this finding, studies reporting the time and outcomes of bleeding were systemically retrieved in Table S1 and summarized in Table . Generally, bleeding was reported in 34 patients from eight studies during the first 3 weeks, which was reported in only 16 patients from six studies 3 weeks after intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, 75% (3/4) bleeding cases in LAMS of our study was observed at about 1 week after procedure, indicating that early bleeding might be more frequent than expected. To confirm this finding, studies reporting the time and outcomes of bleeding were systemically retrieved in Table S1 and summarized in Table . Generally, bleeding was reported in 34 patients from eight studies during the first 3 weeks, which was reported in only 16 patients from six studies 3 weeks after intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, the way of removing the necrotic debris (how complete and the timing) should be further investigated. Given the aforementioned discussion, we agreed with Stecher that exchanging LAMS for plastic pigtail stents before hospital discharge might be feasible for certain patients …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Results from our cohort as well as other recent large cohorts,1–3 6 therefore, confirm the safety of LAMS for PFC drainage. While the exact reasons for higher rates of haemorrhage observed by Bang et al (25%)4 and Stecher et al (17%)5 are unknown, it is possible that sampling bias due to small group sizes contributed to these observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As a limitation, the reports by Bang et al 4 and Stecher et al 5 were based on relatively small group sizes of 12 and 46 LAMS-treated patients, respectively. To investigate whether the reported safety signals are similarly observed in larger patient cohorts, we conducted a retrospective review of all patients who received LAMS for the drainage of PFCs between October 2014 and April 2017 at three medical centres in Germany (University Hospital Kiel, University Medical Centre Dresden, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, Stecher et al 5 described an increased risk of bleeding even with another type of LAMS, the NAGI stent. Finally, Zhu and colleagues6 observed AEs similar to those of Bang et al ,1 such as delayed bleeding, buried stent syndrome and biliary stricture in 50% of the patients after LAMS placement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%