2008 Third International Conference on Communications and Networking in China 2008
DOI: 10.1109/chinacom.2008.4685063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed reservation decision in optical burst switching networks with optical buffers

Abstract: The proposed delayed reservation decision scheme offers the same node complexity as that in general OBS networks with optical buffers. Simulations show the proposed scheme has better performance than existing schemes in terms of burst loss probability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the control packet has successfully reserved the FDL and data channel for the contended data burst, the control packet is updated and sent to the downstream node. According to the instant of sending out the control packet, there are two options: one option is that control packet is electronically buffered with delay D to keep the same offset as the scenario without FDLs [1,2,[9][10][11]; the other option is to send out control packet immediately after its processing [12], as shown in Figure 3. Most previous work [1,2,[9][10][11] note that a burst with longer offset time has lower dropping probability.…”
Section: B Reservation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the control packet has successfully reserved the FDL and data channel for the contended data burst, the control packet is updated and sent to the downstream node. According to the instant of sending out the control packet, there are two options: one option is that control packet is electronically buffered with delay D to keep the same offset as the scenario without FDLs [1,2,[9][10][11]; the other option is to send out control packet immediately after its processing [12], as shown in Figure 3. Most previous work [1,2,[9][10][11] note that a burst with longer offset time has lower dropping probability.…”
Section: B Reservation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four main ways of resolving contention in OBS. The first two are the use of fiber delay lines (FDL) to delay the burst for a discrete and finite period [1] and [2] and deflecting the burst to another output fiber, known as deflection routing [3] and [4]. The third resolution is by implementing wavelength conversion [5] and [6] where a contending burst is sent on another wavelength through wavelength conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%