1967
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1967.21.1.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed Punishment of Positively Reinforced Bar Presses

Abstract: Combining positive and negative reinforcement (both being electrical stimulation of the brain) for lever pressing by 4 rats produced a gradient of suppression as the 2 qualities of reinforcement were separated temporally. Maximal suppression occurred with an interstimulus interval of about 1 sec. This maximum was interpreted as marking the intersection of a waning interaction of the neurologica: aspects of reward and punishment and a delay-of-punishrnent gradient. After the 1 sec. of neural interaction, the gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data of Miller et al (1967) suggest that reducing the interval between stimulations to near zero would result in greater rejection of the predominantly negative stimulation. With zero intervals, supposedly, sequentialness would be of less importance (Miller et ai, 1967).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data of Miller et al (1967) suggest that reducing the interval between stimulations to near zero would result in greater rejection of the predominantly negative stimulation. With zero intervals, supposedly, sequentialness would be of less importance (Miller et ai, 1967).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the swifter the sentence, the stronger the association in the mind of the offender between the offense and its consequences. Classic psychological studies involving laboratory experiments with human and animal subjects have upheld this theory, showing that punishment was significantly more effective at changing behavior when delivered immediately, as compared with when it was delayed (Aronfreed & Reber, 1965; Banks & Vogel-Sprott, 1965; Deluty, 1978; Hare, 1965; Miller, Reid, & Porter, 1967; Pisacreta & Paul, 1982; Vogel-Sprott, 1967).…”
Section: The Speedy Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%