“…The observed errors that were associated with visual inspection and cross correlation were not as high, 3.77 ms and 10.19 ms, for the control and PFPS groups using visual inspection, respectively, and 2.56 ms and 3.27 ms, for the control and PFPS groups using cross-correlation, respectively. It is noted that despite the variation among these techniques, all of the techniques demonstrated that the variability was higher in the PFPS group, indicating that the multifactorial etiology of the syndrome can also affect the results (Cavazzuti et al, 2010). In this study, besides the medical diagnoses, an assessment protocol was applied as proposed by Cowan et al (2002), Jensen et al (2007) and Magee (2008) and Table 2 Values of the mean, SD and SEM of the onset using the three techniques and their associated statistical significances.…”