2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed language development at two years of age in very preterm infants in the Perinatal Network of Haute-Normandie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors reported that premature babies can have problems in lexical acquisition and describe factors that can influence the acquisition of vocabulary, such as the environment, sex, socioeconomic status, maternal education and pregnancy complications 7 , 16 , 18 - 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several authors reported that premature babies can have problems in lexical acquisition and describe factors that can influence the acquisition of vocabulary, such as the environment, sex, socioeconomic status, maternal education and pregnancy complications 7 , 16 , 18 - 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the difficulties in receptive vocabulary, as reported by the application of the PPVT, when parents and teachers were questioned about both receptive and expressive vocabulary, they only reported difficulties in expressive vocabulary. Some studies have used the MCDI instrument to verify the receptive and expressive vocabulary 7 , 18 , 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The instruments used are not the same in all the studies, which is comprehensible given the differences in the ages of assessment. In many of them different adaptations of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI) to different languages were used to assess children of 30 months of age or younger [21,[30][31][32][33]. In these cases, lack of agreement in the results indicates that other factors must be responsible for the discrepancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies do not offer information on the exclusion criteria (Charolais et al, 2014; Lee and Lee, 2016), which does not guaranty (all the contrary) that the sample of PT children are free of these biomedical hazards (IVH, PLM, BPD, etc.). Two studies directly chose participants who were in the NICU for a long stay [32,34]. Another study [27], which used strict exclusion criteria, however, also included children with BPD in the PT group because one aim of the study was to test the effect of this disease on the risk of suffering language delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%