Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001970.pub4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

Abstract: Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants (Review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no benefit has been shown for delayed (12) or slow (13) introduction of EF in the prevention of NEC, evidence is lacking on the length of the period between the treatment of NEC and the moment at which EF can be restarted safely. Although a period of 7-10 d of discontinuation of EF has been recommended (14), faster reintroduction after NEC seems feasible in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no benefit has been shown for delayed (12) or slow (13) introduction of EF in the prevention of NEC, evidence is lacking on the length of the period between the treatment of NEC and the moment at which EF can be restarted safely. Although a period of 7-10 d of discontinuation of EF has been recommended (14), faster reintroduction after NEC seems feasible in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sisk et al 29 have reported a significant decrease in the risk of NEC with early breast milk feeding in preterm infants, while a recent Cochrane systematic review concluded that delaying the introduction of enteral feeds for up to 5-7 days did not increase the risk of developing NEC in very preterm infants. 30 (Table 2). 31 A more recent classification was proposed by Gordon et al, 32 encompassing other acquired neonatal gastrointestinal disorders in the preterm infant that might mimic NEC, such as feeding intolerance of prematurity, viral enteritis of infancy, spontaneous intestinal perforation, NEC caused predominantly by ischemia, and cow's milk protein allergy.…”
Section: Bacterial Colonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once trophic feeds have been started, the timing of increasing enteral feeds is still unclear. A Cochrane systematic review compared the commencement of increasing enteral feeds (either within 4 days or later than 5-7 days), 30 and found no differences in the incidence of NEC (relative risk [RR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.64-1.34) or all-cause mortality (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.78-2.01) between these two groups. An additional concern is the rate of increase of enteral feeds in the most vulnerable preterm infants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early GI maturation may help to prevent later adverse effects of slow growth and inadequate nutrient intake in preterm infants (30). On the other hand, too rapid advancement of enteral feeding is associated with high NEC risk, and delayed advancement of enteral feeding may decrease NEC risk in both preterm infants and pigs (20,32,33). Consequently, a gradual introduction of mother's own milk, donor milk, or infant formula ("minimal enteral nutrition," daily increases of 10 -20 ml·kg Ϫ1 ·day Ϫ1 ), is often used for 1-2 wk after birth as adjunct to parenteral nutrition (PN), before transition to full enteral feeding at 2-4 wk (e.g., 150 -180 ml·kg Ϫ1 ·day Ϫ1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%