2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed Intra-articular Inflammatory Reaction Due to Poly-L-Lactide Bioabsorbable Interference Screw Used in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioabsorbable interference screws are known to be associated with delayed intraarticular inflammatory reaction 17 . In contrast, autogenous bone plugs are biocompatible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioabsorbable interference screws are known to be associated with delayed intraarticular inflammatory reaction 17 . In contrast, autogenous bone plugs are biocompatible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, despite the above findings, it has also been reported that PLLA and metallic screws are not significantly different in terms of biocompatibility and that no signs of inflammatory foreign body reaction were observed over 4 years of observation after PLLA implant placement. 18 Reported foreign body reactions to the PLLA implants include pretibial sterile abscess 9 and subcutaneous pretibial ganglion 23 formation, delayed intra-articular inflammatory reaction, 16 tibial and pretibial cyst formation, 17 aseptic synovitis, 21 foreign body gonitis, 22 and osteolytic foreign body reaction, 4,19 whereas reported foreign body reactions to PGA implants include osteolytic foreign body reaction, 1,2,5,12,24 aseptic synovitis, 13 and immune response. 20 Although mechanical complications such as breakage 10,11,14 and protrusion into the neighboring soft tissue 10 have been documented for the RIGIDFIX system, this type of biological response to its PLLA component has not been previously described in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to two clinical follow-up studies, a clinically manifest foreign-body reaction to polylactide devices is very rare when the fixation devices are implanted intraosseously [50, 51]; but late foreign-body reactions have been reported in some cases when PLLA plates have been used on the bone [40, 52]. Intra-articular inflammatory reactions after the use of PLLA implants in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee have been reported [53, 54]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%