The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed herniation of intra-abdominal contents after blunt right-sided diaphragm rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Sensitivities of X-ray alone for diaphragm injury without herniation is 25%-50%. 4 With the use of newer generation CT scanners, the diagnostic sensitivity for detecting diaphragmatic injuries at the time of injury is 71%-90%. 5 Despite improved sensitivities with CTs, in the setting of recent blunt trauma and new or worsening abdominal pain, a low threshold should be maintained to initiate workup for delayed diaphragmatic injury because of its associated morbidity and mortality of 40%-60% if missed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Sensitivities of X-ray alone for diaphragm injury without herniation is 25%-50%. 4 With the use of newer generation CT scanners, the diagnostic sensitivity for detecting diaphragmatic injuries at the time of injury is 71%-90%. 5 Despite improved sensitivities with CTs, in the setting of recent blunt trauma and new or worsening abdominal pain, a low threshold should be maintained to initiate workup for delayed diaphragmatic injury because of its associated morbidity and mortality of 40%-60% if missed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timeframe from injury to presentation ranges from days to years after the inciting event, with the longest reported delay being 50 years 3 . Sensitivities of X‐ray alone for diaphragm injury without herniation is 25%–50% 4 . With the use of newer generation CT scanners, the diagnostic sensitivity for detecting diaphragmatic injuries at the time of injury is 71%–90% 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the more acceptable explanation for the delayed detection of diaphragmatic defects is that the injury usually only manifests when the herniation occurs 12) . Patients with an undiagnosed rupture of the diaphragm can develop symptoms after a delay of weeks, months, or even years 6) . There are no gold diagnostic methods with a high sensitivity or specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%