1995
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199504150-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed Graft Function, Acute Rejection, and Outcome After Cadaver Renal Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
213
7
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
213
7
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This result could be anticipated taking into consideration that DGF is associated with an increased recruitment of inflammatory cells and an increased risk for the development of acute rejection (32,33). Even in rejection-free patients, DGF is an independent risk factor for late graft failure owing to CAN (34).…”
Section: Progression Of Chronic Allograft Nephropathymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This result could be anticipated taking into consideration that DGF is associated with an increased recruitment of inflammatory cells and an increased risk for the development of acute rejection (32,33). Even in rejection-free patients, DGF is an independent risk factor for late graft failure owing to CAN (34).…”
Section: Progression Of Chronic Allograft Nephropathymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our finding parallels results from studies within the general transplant population that have demonstrated an association between prolonged CIT and increased risks for the development of delayed graft function (DGF) and graft loss. [17][18][19][20] We have previously shown that the effect of CIT on outcomes after kidney transplantation is more pronounced among HIV + recipients compared with their HIV 2 counterparts. 21 These findings motivate a focus in clinical practice to reduce CIT in HIV + recipients.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most frequently defined as the requirement for dialysis during the first week after transplantation, it has been associated with short-and longterm adverse outcomes including decreased graft function and decreased graft and patient survival (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Absence of immediate function complicates the recipient's peritransplant management including the choice of an immunosuppression strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%