2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed gamma power measurement for sodium-cooled fast reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 16 shows a row temporal gamma spectrum obtained during a clad failure experiment conducted at the OSIRIS testing reactor where an elementary integration time equal to 5 s is considered [15][16]. The large fluctuations induced difficulties for the fitting of the Gaussian peak required to quantify isotope activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 16 shows a row temporal gamma spectrum obtained during a clad failure experiment conducted at the OSIRIS testing reactor where an elementary integration time equal to 5 s is considered [15][16]. The large fluctuations induced difficulties for the fitting of the Gaussian peak required to quantify isotope activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could then address a large industrial application field as process monitoring, area monitoring, portable monitoring, and embedded detection [6] [7] [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the intrinsic Peak-to-Compton ratio of the primary spectrometer (HPGe, in some cases LaBr3) may be high, there are measurement environments under which the impact of this continuum may be prohibitive. Two signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) configurations are paradigmatic of these impediments: 1) the need to detect low-activity nuclear fuel under average natural radiological background, as in the case of waste container characterization [7], wide-area decommissioning [8], environmental monitoring, and 2) in nuclear reactor environments [9] [10]. In both cases, the random fluctuation level of the Compton baseline with respect to the FEP signal degrades the detection limit of the spectrometry chain, thus preventing adequate and swift countermeasure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%