2021
DOI: 10.1177/12034754211027854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed Cutaneous Reactivity Associated With COVID-19 Vaccines Is Rare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since COVID‐19 vaccination is spreading, there have been numerous reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 The fear of the vaccine in the population is not justified, since many supposed reactions to the vaccine are in fact not due to it. 5 , 6 In our sample, only one of the 21 patients reporting skin reactions required hospitalization for generalized bullous erythema multiforme, which occurred 48 h after the second Moderna vaccine dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since COVID‐19 vaccination is spreading, there have been numerous reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 The fear of the vaccine in the population is not justified, since many supposed reactions to the vaccine are in fact not due to it. 5 , 6 In our sample, only one of the 21 patients reporting skin reactions required hospitalization for generalized bullous erythema multiforme, which occurred 48 h after the second Moderna vaccine dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where the same sample was used for more than one study, all studies were reviewed to determine the extent to which there may be duplication in the reported outcomes between studies. The full text of selected studies was reviewed, and data on demographics, article type, number of reported cases with cutaneous involvement, vaccine, and rash type (morphology) were extracted from articles texts, tables, figures, and summarized through a descriptive table (Table 1)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%