2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1365-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task

Abstract: Systematic deviations occur when blindfolded subjects set a test bar parallel to a reference bar in the horizontal plane using haptic information (Kappers and Koenderink 1999, Perception 28:781-795; Kappers 1999, Perception 28:1001-1012). These deviations are assumed to reflect the use of a combination of a biasing egocentric reference frame and an allocentric, more cognitive one (Kappers 2002, Acta Psychol 109:25-40). In two experiments, we have examined the effect of delay between the perception of a referen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
83
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(71 reference statements)
11
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the perception of this information is not always accurate, as demonstrated by numerous studies that have shown the presence of large perceptual errors when judging an orientation. For example, in the haptic modality, several studies have shown that blindfolded people can misalign two bars by as much 55°when the bars are widely separated (e.g., Kappers, 1999;Postma, Zuidhoek, Noordzij, & Kappers, 2008;Zuidhoek, Kappers, van der Lubbe, & Postma, 2003). Similar effects have also been observed in the visual modality, which has traditionally been studied more extensively than the haptic modality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the perception of this information is not always accurate, as demonstrated by numerous studies that have shown the presence of large perceptual errors when judging an orientation. For example, in the haptic modality, several studies have shown that blindfolded people can misalign two bars by as much 55°when the bars are widely separated (e.g., Kappers, 1999;Postma, Zuidhoek, Noordzij, & Kappers, 2008;Zuidhoek, Kappers, van der Lubbe, & Postma, 2003). Similar effects have also been observed in the visual modality, which has traditionally been studied more extensively than the haptic modality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Moreover, comparing the results of standard studies with those that involved the transfer of orientation between two locations suggests that different experimental factors might affect the underlying reference frame and the parameters of the extended CA model. For example, such a view would be in agreement with the observation that an unfilled delay leads a reduction of the systematic errors in the parallelity, which can be interpreted as a shift from the egocentric toward the allocentric reference during the delay period (Zuidhoek et al, 2003), but has no bearing on the oblique effect unless the delay is filled with an interpolated task (Gentaz & Hatwell, 1999). Still, this view does not exclude the possibility that the same factors affect both sets of processes.…”
Section: Limits Of the Extended Ca Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Zuidhoek et al (2003) have shown that in the parallelity experiment, a time delay in between the exploration of the reference bar and the setting of the test bar results in significantly smaller deviations. A delay supposedly induces a shift from the egocentrically biased spatial representation towards a more allocentric one (e.g., Rossetti, Gaunet, & Thinus-Blanc, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has been shown that a time delay between exploring the reference bar and orienting the test bar, results in significantly smaller deviations (Zuidhoek et al, 2003). Zuidhoek and colleagues suggested that the role of visual imagery might play a role in strengthening the allocentric representation of space, which in turn would result in smaller deviations.…”
Section: Experiments 3: Visual Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation