OFC/NFOEC Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/ofc.2005.193009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay distributed VCAT for efficient data-optical transport

Abstract: Bell Lobs, Lucenf Technologiu. 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hili, NJO7974 { " m o r , chitru, poosa?a]@e.search. bell-labs.comAbstrack We introduce a novel scheme that flexibly distributes the differential delays in virtual concatenation (VCAT) paths in SUNET/SD€I networks. We show that this increases the utilization of the network in carrying dynamic traffic and reduces the total buffer requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table II shows the bandwidth efficiency of VCAT compared with CCAT. 12 Mbps] in one VCG to transmit 100 Mbps Ethernet data. Such heterogeneous combination of VC's in one VCG is termed as cross virtual concatenation (CVC).…”
Section: Bandwidth Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table II shows the bandwidth efficiency of VCAT compared with CCAT. 12 Mbps] in one VCG to transmit 100 Mbps Ethernet data. Such heterogeneous combination of VC's in one VCG is termed as cross virtual concatenation (CVC).…”
Section: Bandwidth Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research paper [12] came up with an improvement over VCAT, called DD-VCAT, which allows higher utilisation and lower costs through flexible distribution of buffers. By decreasing the differential delay at the destination, we can effectively reduce the amount of buffer space needed.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cycles are usually undesired in networking but in the MP context they can compensate for delay differences without adding buffering capabilities at the destination nodes or transit nodes of a path, as proposed in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, centralized DDC results in increasingly large buffer structures that may hinder the network costeffectiveness [8]. Alternatively, recent studies [9,10] have proved that distributing the DDC operations throughout the intermediate path nodes leads to a substantial reduction on the size of the buffers. Such DDC distribution has already been implemented and demonstrated [11] in an opaque optical network scenario, i.e., considering that the optical signal is electronically processed at each hop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%