“…On the surface it may seem absurd that a task that was derived from an experiment with pigeons (Ainslie & Herrnstein, 1981), and then extrapolated to humans, one that involves asking a series of questions about preferring $10 today to some other amount in the future, may have anything to do with anything. But it turns out that discounting curves and the k and AUC parameters that describe them have much to do with everything, from a takedown of rational choice theory (Herrnstein, 1990), to maternal health (Higgins et al, 2017;Yoon et al, 2007), genetic sensitization to alcohol (Mitchell, Reeves, Li, & Phillips, 2006), classroom token economies (Reed & Martens, 2011), obesity (Jarmolowicz et al, 2017;Lawyer, Boomhower, & Rasmussen, 2015), melanoma detection (Critchfield & Howard, 2016), and predicting substance abuse treatment outcomes (Stanger et al, 2012) These connections are so diverse that delay discounting is considered a trans-disease process that may underlie many health-related outcomes (Bickel, Jarmolowicz, Mueller, Koffarnus, & Gatchalian, 2012). Not bad for a pretty hyperbolic curve.…”