2017
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay discounting as impaired valuation: Delayed rewards in an animal obesity model

Abstract: Obesity is a major public health problem, which, like many forms of addiction, is associated with an elevated tendency to choose smaller immediate rather than larger delayed rewards, a response pattern often referred to as excessive delay discounting. Although some accounts of delay discounting conceptualize this process as impulsivity (placing the emphasis on overvaluing the smaller immediate reward), others have conceptualized delay discounting as an executive function (placing the emphasis on delayed reward… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because some individuals accept lower overall starvation risk than others, and because storage and defence are both strategies to reduce starvation risk, we expect to observe positive correlations between body weight and foraging-behaviour defence when we compare across individuals from unselected populations. Indeed, positive associations between body weight and food motivation are commonly reported in both mammals and birds [9][10][11]; however, whether the behavioural tasks used in such studies really capture defence of the rate of energy intake, rather than just the rate of energy intake when food is easy to obtain, is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some individuals accept lower overall starvation risk than others, and because storage and defence are both strategies to reduce starvation risk, we expect to observe positive correlations between body weight and foraging-behaviour defence when we compare across individuals from unselected populations. Indeed, positive associations between body weight and food motivation are commonly reported in both mammals and birds [9][10][11]; however, whether the behavioural tasks used in such studies really capture defence of the rate of energy intake, rather than just the rate of energy intake when food is easy to obtain, is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine were as high as that of the lean group [121]. But in contrast with human, obese individuals were more likely to be present-focused, choosing smaller immediate rewards rather than larger delayed rewards (excessive delay discounting) [122,123].…”
Section: Rodent Models Of Obesity and Acupuncture/electroacupuncturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the context of operant conditioning (lever pressing) with delayed rewards as executive function, obese Zucker rats learned to press the liver more quickly than lean animals. Their progressive ratio breakpoints (a measure of reward efficacy) were as high as that of the lean group [ 121 ]. But in contrast with human, obese individuals were more likely to be present-focused, choosing smaller immediate rewards rather than larger delayed rewards (excessive delay discounting) [ 122 , 123 ].…”
Section: Rodent Models Of Obesity and Acupuncture/electroacupuncturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the surface it may seem absurd that a task that was derived from an experiment with pigeons (Ainslie & Herrnstein, 1981), and then extrapolated to humans, one that involves asking a series of questions about preferring $10 today to some other amount in the future, may have anything to do with anything. But it turns out that discounting curves and the k and AUC parameters that describe them have much to do with everything, from a takedown of rational choice theory (Herrnstein, 1990), to maternal health (Higgins et al, 2017;Yoon et al, 2007), genetic sensitization to alcohol (Mitchell, Reeves, Li, & Phillips, 2006), classroom token economies (Reed & Martens, 2011), obesity (Jarmolowicz et al, 2017;Lawyer, Boomhower, & Rasmussen, 2015), melanoma detection (Critchfield & Howard, 2016), and predicting substance abuse treatment outcomes (Stanger et al, 2012) These connections are so diverse that delay discounting is considered a trans-disease process that may underlie many health-related outcomes (Bickel, Jarmolowicz, Mueller, Koffarnus, & Gatchalian, 2012). Not bad for a pretty hyperbolic curve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%