2008
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2008.0288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delamination toughness of electron beam physical vapor deposition (EB-PVD) Y2O3–ZrO2 thermal barrier coatings by the pushout method: Effect of thermal cycling temperature

Abstract: A pushout test method was used to quantify effect of thermal cycling temperatures on the delamination toughness of an electron beam physical vapor deposited thermal barrier coating (EB-PVD TBC). The delamination toughness, Γi, was related to the maximum thermal cycling temperature, Th, equal to 1000, 1025, 1050, and 1100 °C. The measured delamination toughness varied from 9 to 95 J/m2. At Th = 1000 °C, Γi attained a maximum value, larger than that of the as-deposited sample and decreasing with increased Th. Du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This direction of loading adds to the compression in the coating from the thermal expansion mismatch and therefore more closely mimics the delamination conditions experienced in service. Kagawa and colleagues have developed two related tests, the barb test 12 and the push-out test, 13 to measure delamination toughness of TBCs. In each test, the coating is subject to additional compression by forcing it, but not the substrate, against a hard block.…”
Section: Tests For Measuring Delamination Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This direction of loading adds to the compression in the coating from the thermal expansion mismatch and therefore more closely mimics the delamination conditions experienced in service. Kagawa and colleagues have developed two related tests, the barb test 12 and the push-out test, 13 to measure delamination toughness of TBCs. In each test, the coating is subject to additional compression by forcing it, but not the substrate, against a hard block.…”
Section: Tests For Measuring Delamination Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the aforementioned bridge test, the barb and pushout tests require highly refined specimen preparation and sophisticated testing which are likely to limit their use for routine toughness testing. Nevertheless, Kagawa and colleagues 13 have collected an extensive data set showing how the toughness Fig. 3.…”
Section: Tests For Measuring Delamination Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pushout test method was used to measure the delamination behavior under shear loading conditions [19][20][21] . The substrate side of an APS-TBCs specimen was bonded using an epoxy-based adhesive and polished to form a pushout specimen.…”
Section: Pushout Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the low driving force for crack propagation and the dif culty of applying the unique vertical load to the coating, symmetrical crack propagation does not occur often. Barb [14][15][16][17][18] , pushout [19][20][21] , and other shear tests 22) have also been developed to measure delamination toughness under shear loading. Changes of delamination toughness in different interfacial roughness at as deposited state and in different heating condition such as isothermal heat exposure and thermal cycling have been evaluated in the electron beam physical vapor deposited TBCs (EB-PVD TBCs) by barb and pushout tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%