2006
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

del5p/dup5q in a ‘cri du chat’ patient without parental chromosomal rearrangement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present living case is one of the few that had typical features of Rett syndrome, where a disease-causing hemizygous c.316C>T (rs28934907, p.R106W) missense mutation at the MECP2 gene might represent somatic mosaicism. Moreover, given that the MEPC2 mutations were dominant in character, the absence of a c.316C>T mutation in the mother indicated the mutation to be de novo in the patient or the presence of gonadal mosaicism in the mother (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present living case is one of the few that had typical features of Rett syndrome, where a disease-causing hemizygous c.316C>T (rs28934907, p.R106W) missense mutation at the MECP2 gene might represent somatic mosaicism. Moreover, given that the MEPC2 mutations were dominant in character, the absence of a c.316C>T mutation in the mother indicated the mutation to be de novo in the patient or the presence of gonadal mosaicism in the mother (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination is virtually always associated with parental large pericentric inversions that lead to the formation of an inversion loop, promoting the production of double segmental aneusomy or meiotic recombination aneusomy in the gametes [de Perdigo et al, 1989]. Among previously reported cri-du-chat syndrome cases with meiotic recombination, the aneusomy of chromosome 5 in all [Faed et al, 1972;Neibuhr, 1978;Beemer et al, 1984;Miyazaki et al, 1985;Schroeder et al, 1986;Sonoda et al, 1989;Ono et al, 1993;Levy et al, 2002] but one case [Akalin et al, 2006] was cytogenetically visible using G-banding. When an accompanying 5q trisomy is detected, a significant recurrence risk is expected [Anton et al, 2005].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%