1981
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/61.10.1438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deinstitutionalization and Normalization of Persons with Mental Retardation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The movement of normalisation and deinstitutionalisation were also introduced in the middle of the 1960s, which advocated removing these students from life in institutions to be integrated with their families and local communities (Osgood, 2005). This movement had the dual effect of reducing the population at ‘major institutions and establishing a variety of community facilities’ (Schlichkorn, 1981, p.1438). During this time, there were several court cases that argued for the delivery of special education services in the LRE for students with disabilities.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Lrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement of normalisation and deinstitutionalisation were also introduced in the middle of the 1960s, which advocated removing these students from life in institutions to be integrated with their families and local communities (Osgood, 2005). This movement had the dual effect of reducing the population at ‘major institutions and establishing a variety of community facilities’ (Schlichkorn, 1981, p.1438). During this time, there were several court cases that argued for the delivery of special education services in the LRE for students with disabilities.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Lrementioning
confidence: 99%