1984
DOI: 10.1021/i300015a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dehydrogenation of methanol to methyl formate over copper catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our results, acetaldehyde and methanol were previously obtained as main products over Cu-AC catalysts [17]. In the case of catalyst 50% Cu-AC, the high Cu particle size favored the production of methyl formate by dehydrogenation of methanol Reaction (7), as previously reported [33]. Figure 4a,b summarize the effect of the applied current and the reaction temperature on the steady state CO 2 consumption rate (after 350 min of polarization), respectively.…”
Section: Co 2 Conversion Electrocatalytic Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with our results, acetaldehyde and methanol were previously obtained as main products over Cu-AC catalysts [17]. In the case of catalyst 50% Cu-AC, the high Cu particle size favored the production of methyl formate by dehydrogenation of methanol Reaction (7), as previously reported [33]. Figure 4a,b summarize the effect of the applied current and the reaction temperature on the steady state CO 2 consumption rate (after 350 min of polarization), respectively.…”
Section: Co 2 Conversion Electrocatalytic Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A series of thermal catalytic investigations on gas-phase dehydrogenation of CH 3 OH to HCOOCH 3 over copper-based catalysts 31 3 OH were coadsorbed, we found that the cross-coupling reaction occurs (see Figure 5), and in a separate experiment that started with adsorbed CH 2 O, we saw no evidence for formation of HCOOCH 3 , indicating that the self-coupling reaction does not occur ( Figure 6). Thus, we conclude that the cross-coupling reaction also proceeds An experiment with coadsorbed CH 3 O and CH 2 O was performed to verify that the cross-coupling reaction was photocatalyzed and occurred during irradiation, rather than during TPD via a thermal mechanism.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the reaction, methanol was converted to methyl formate, CO, and H 2 . Although formaldehyde was supposed to be firstly produced, it was not detected in the [20] suggested that the formation of methyl formate from formaldehyde was rapid and the formation of formaldehyde from methanol was the rate-controlling step, which well explained the absence of formaldehyde in the products. For the Cu(5)/SiO 2 , Cu(10)/SiO 2 , and Cu(20)/SiO 2 catalysts, with increasing reaction temperatures from 200 to 280 8C,the conversions of methanol increased from 0.9% to 50.1%, 2.3% to 55.5%, and 4.8% to 59.2%, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Catalytic Activities Of Copper-based Catalysts In Methanol Dmentioning
confidence: 99%