2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dehydrogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and UV bump

Abstract: Context. Recent calculations have shown that the UV bump at about 217.5 nm in the extinction curve can be explained by a complex mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in several ionisation states. Other studies proposed that the carriers are a restricted population made of neutral and singly-ionised dehydrogenated coronene molecules (C 24 H n , n ≤ 3), in line with models of the hydrogenation state of interstellar PAHs predicting that medium-sized species are highly dehydrogenated. Aims. To assess… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(55 reference statements)
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Xiang et al (2011), we find that the 2175Å bump does not correlate with DIBs, except the λ6699Å DIB shows a tendency of correlating with the 2175Å bump. This suggests that it is unlikely for the extinction bump and DIBs to share a common carrier (see Figures 8d-14d for the selected DIBs), posing a challenge to the hypothesis of PAHs being responsible for both the 2175Å bump (Joblin et al 1992, Li & Draine 2001a, Cecchi-Pestellini et al 2008, Malloci et al 2008, Steglich et al 2010 and DIBs (Crawford et al 1985, Léger & d'Hendecourt 1985, van der Zwet & Allamandola 1985, Salama et al 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar to Xiang et al (2011), we find that the 2175Å bump does not correlate with DIBs, except the λ6699Å DIB shows a tendency of correlating with the 2175Å bump. This suggests that it is unlikely for the extinction bump and DIBs to share a common carrier (see Figures 8d-14d for the selected DIBs), posing a challenge to the hypothesis of PAHs being responsible for both the 2175Å bump (Joblin et al 1992, Li & Draine 2001a, Cecchi-Pestellini et al 2008, Malloci et al 2008, Steglich et al 2010 and DIBs (Crawford et al 1985, Léger & d'Hendecourt 1985, van der Zwet & Allamandola 1985, Salama et al 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the other species we use the UV absorption cross section of the molecule with the closest number of H atoms within the same ionization state. We expect this to be a good approximation, based on the analysis of Malloci et al (2008). Even though the overall shape varies somewhat with dehydrogenation, when calculating the average photon energy absorbed in a given stellar radiation field, the absorbed average energy varies by less than 1 eV for the different hydrogenation states, being slightly higher for dehydrogenated states.…”
Section: Ionization Yield and Uv Absorption Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For the normally hydrogenated species, we have taken estimates from experiments when available . If no experimental values were available, we then adopted results from quantum theory (Malloci et al 2007(Malloci et al , 2008, or estimates based upon conducting disk behaviour (Bakes & Tielens 1994). See more details in Appendix A.…”
Section: Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations