Dehumanization after terrorism: the role of psychophysiological emotion regulation and trait emotional intelligence

Abstract

In recent years, numerous terrorist attacks have been perpetrated, inducing a reaction even in people who were not directly exposed. In this scenery, we measured people's blatant dehumanization of Arabs in the aftermath of the attack that took place in Manchester, UK in 2017. The goal of the present work was to assess how dehumanization of a whole group blamed for the attack was influenced by physiological regulation and trait emotional intelligence (trait EI). Further, we measured how this relation changed over time. Participants' trait EI and psychophysiological regulation (as indexed by heart rate variability) were measured, a first time, in the immediate after math of the terrorist attack. After watching a video of the attack, participants were presented with a measure of blatant dehumanization. The same procedure was repeated 2 weeks later. Findings indicated that at Time 1 there was no effect of either physiological regulation or trait EI, as participants showed an overall tendency to dehumanized Arabs. At Time 2, however, dehumanization was predicted by an interaction between physiological regulation and trait EI. Among people displaying high reactivity when watching the video, those with low trait EI had a tendency to dehumanize Arabs more so than those with high trait EI (no significant effect of trait EI was found for people with low reactivity). The contributions of the present work to both theory and social policy are discussed.

Environmental and psychological variables influencing reactions to the COVID‐19 outbreak

“…Instead, for ineffective regulators, the increased number of protective behaviours was related to their risk perception. This finding is consistent with the literature on emotion regulation and how people react to real-life emotionally loaded events (e.g., terrorist attacks; Scrimin & Rubaltelli, 2019), although it was reported for the first time in relation to a global pandemic. Importantly, emotion regulation was not associated with a lower risk perception as it was found in other contexts.…”

Dehumanization: trends, insights, and challenges

“…Leveraging a novel face-morphing method (Figure 2), researchers provided new evidence for outgroup dehumanization, finding that participants were faster to attribute mind to face morphs varying on a continuum from inanimate to fully human when those morphs were based on ingroup (versus outgroup) faces [14] (but see Study 3). Other work has used neuroimaging and measures of heart rate variability to better identify the neural and physiological underpinnings of dehumanization, respectively [11,[15][16][17][18]. Researchers have also developed psycholinguistic dictionaries and computational methods to investigate subtle dehumanization in natural language (e.g., describing targets using fewer words related to agency and experience [19][20][21][22]).…”

The Role of Emotional Competences in Parents’ Vaccine Hesitancy

“…It has been shown by several studies that EC modulates risk perception and the estimates of future negative or positive events. For example, people with low EC showed a stronger relation between more negative emotions and the belief that future terrorist attacks would occur in their small town rather than in farther locations, with a greater tendency to see immigrants as threatening [ 21 , 22 ]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that EC moderates the relation between knowledge and decision making related to food.…”