1948
DOI: 10.1177/004051754801801004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degree of Polymerization of Cellulose in Cotton Fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This large MW difference between the components of primary and secondary walls of cotton confirms that previously observed for the cellulose fractions. Hessler et al (1948) determined that the cellulose of immature-fiber samples (primary wall only) had an MW = 960 000, while maturefiber samples contained cellulose with MW = 1 730 000 (DP= 10 650) with the average MW dependent on the stage of development, the variety and location of growth, and the degree of degradation or damage. Marx-Figini (1982) reported that cellulose from the primary wall of cotton has a heterogeneous MW of 325 000-970 000, while the secondary-wall cellulose has an MW = 2 270 000 (DP = 14 000) and is monodisperse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This large MW difference between the components of primary and secondary walls of cotton confirms that previously observed for the cellulose fractions. Hessler et al (1948) determined that the cellulose of immature-fiber samples (primary wall only) had an MW = 960 000, while maturefiber samples contained cellulose with MW = 1 730 000 (DP= 10 650) with the average MW dependent on the stage of development, the variety and location of growth, and the degree of degradation or damage. Marx-Figini (1982) reported that cellulose from the primary wall of cotton has a heterogeneous MW of 325 000-970 000, while the secondary-wall cellulose has an MW = 2 270 000 (DP = 14 000) and is monodisperse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been recognized that fiber strength is determined by the structural organization of the cellulose chains (Hessler et al 1948); agreement about that relationship, particularly with respect to polymeric, supramolecular and morphological structure varies widely (see Nevell and Zeronian 1985). Thus, our objectives are to understand relationships between fiber strength and the formation of cotton fiber structure and the role of the primary wall in determination of that structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of viscosity on weathered cotton indicates cellulose chain rupture through oxidation. Furthermore oxidation may be detected through an alkali boil and subsequent viscosity determination [3]. Copper alkaline solution methods break the oxygen bonds and as a result measure total degradation of cellulose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural changes in the cellulose molecule which have an effect on dyeing occur. Cellulose chain length is decreased [3] and ultimately the utility of the cotton suffers. Previous work [6] on the physical properties of weathered cotton gave indications of length shrinkage which may be interpreted as possible structural changes in the cellulose molecule (crystallinity) .…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of wastes in the original work [9] invalidates the conclusions, on the basis that high molecular weight materials might have been concentrated in the wastes. However, it is known that immature fibers are concentrated in the picker wastes, and the work of Hessler, Merola, and Berkley [7] indicates the molecular weight of the cellulose in immature fibers to be about half that of mature fibers obtained from the same source.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%