2019
DOI: 10.2140/ant.2019.13.2191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degree of irrationality of very general abelian surfaces

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Corollary D. The quotient map from A to the Kummer surface A/ ± 1 has degree 2, so it suffices to prove irr(A/ ± 1) = 2. The main result of [4] can be rephrased as saying that a very general Kummer surface has degree of irrationality equal to 2. It follows that one can put A/ ± 1 in a family over a curve such that the very general member has degree of irrationality equal to 2.…”
Section: Maps To Ruled Varieties Specializementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof of Corollary D. The quotient map from A to the Kummer surface A/ ± 1 has degree 2, so it suffices to prove irr(A/ ± 1) = 2. The main result of [4] can be rephrased as saying that a very general Kummer surface has degree of irrationality equal to 2. It follows that one can put A/ ± 1 in a family over a curve such that the very general member has degree of irrationality equal to 2.…”
Section: Maps To Ruled Varieties Specializementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By work of the first author [4], it is known that a very general abelian surface A has irr(A) 4. From Proposition C, we are able to deduce: COROLLARY D. Every complex abelian surface A has irr(A) 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case when X is a curve leads to the classical notion of gonality, whereas for dim(X) ≥ 2 very little is known in general and the problem has recently received considerable attention. The main results in this direction are for hypersurfaces [5,6,9,21,25] or abelian varieties [2,8,11,15,16,20,22,23,26] or hyper-Kähler varieties [24] or more specific examples [1,13]. Giving a sharp lower bound is in general a very difficult problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a great deal of interest concerning measures of irrationality of projective varieties, that is birational invariants, which somehow measure the failure of a given variety to be rational (see, e.g., [3,5,8,10,16,18,19]), and several interesting results have been obtained in this direction for very general hypersurfaces of large degree (cf. [2][3][4]20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%